CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

particle separation efficiency

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By CeesH

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 21, 2015, 07:06
Question particle separation efficiency
  #1
New Member
 
afsaneh
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 11
afsaneh is on a distinguished road
hello
i study on simulation particle tracking in a hydrocyclone to predict particle separation efficiency. in my system particles are exist in water with 2% volume fraction.
i found some method for simulation: 1)first run my fluid simulation without solid (K-epsilon viscous model) then run DPM 2) run eulerian and DPM multiphase model both 3) run mixture and granular multiphase model

with this regrade, i want to now for my case (2% solid) which method is better?

i have one more question: when i choose 1 or 0.1 or 0.01 step size with 1000 iteration i face AVG problem for k or epsilon but if i choose 0.001 step size with 1000, i have no problem in fact it runs just for 1 s flow time!! why this problem occurs ?

i really appreciate you if you can help me
afsaneh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2015, 07:55
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0
CeesH is on a distinguished road
To answer which is better; that is something you either have to test yourself, or draw from literature. All methods have their pros and cons (regarding the options, I assume you mean DPM OR Eulerian and not and?)

related to your question, you have to select a timestep size appropriate to capture the physics in your problem. It seems this is around 0.001s for your particular case. The fact that you only run for 1 second is logical, 1000 timesteps of 0.001 second adds up to 1 second.
afsaneh and Alnasi like this.
CeesH is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2015, 14:38
Default ansys
  #3
New Member
 
afsaneh
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 11
afsaneh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by CeesH View Post
To answer which is better; that is something you either have to test yourself, or draw from literature. All methods have their pros and cons (regarding the options, I assume you mean DPM OR Eulerian and not and?)

related to your question, you have to select a timestep size appropriate to capture the physics in your problem. It seems this is around 0.001s for your particular case. The fact that you only run for 1 second is logical, 1000 timesteps of 0.001 second adds up to 1 second.
dear CeesH:
hi
thanks for your help.
yes, i choose these method from literature but i don't know which one is the most suitable for my case because of low solid volume fraction. in ansys 15 i understood that i can use 2 phase eulerian multiphase model which one phase is my continuous phase and one discrete phase mosel.
about my second question, i meant that if my total flow time be just 1 second
isn't it gave me wrong efficiency, because separating particle just in 1 s is not logical
afsaneh is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Particle separation in an axial cyclone Cloudseeker CFX 3 August 19, 2014 20:13
Cyclone separation efficiency & Particle Trajectories Mukhtiar Ali FLUENT 0 December 26, 2013 00:19
droplet separation off a particle in turbulent stream anonymous_89 Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2013 13:40
injection problem Mark New FLUENT 0 August 4, 2013 01:30
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] dm2747 FLUENT 0 April 17, 2009 01:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57.