CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Continuity

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 14, 2003, 11:35
Default Continuity
  #1
DAE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

I am modelling the flow of an incompressible fluid through a structure.

Due to the complexity of this structure, the use of hexahedral elements is not practical, thus tetrahedral are being used.

My question to anyone that can help is, do you know why I am getting a net gain of mass of 1.6kg/s when the mass-flowrate is 6kg/s.

The solver is steady state.

The inlet is a velocity inlet, and the outlets are velocity inlets with negative velocities. I have tried pressure outlets, but for my problem, setting the correct pressure on the boundary is not easy to get continuity right, thus the use of pressure outlets is not practical either.

Each velocity inlet has a minimum of 6 cells across the diameter, thus providing one either side of the inlet for a crude boundary layer, and 4 for the bulk of the flow.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2003, 15:23
Default Re: Continuity
  #2
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why don't you try using Outflow as boundary conditions for your outlets?

Outflow BC imposes a zero diffusion flux of all variables and applies a mass balance correction. All others variables are calculated supposing a fully developed flow.

This boundary can't be used if flow density changes, if you're using Pressure Inlets, or if you're modeling compressible flows (not your case).

Hi

ap
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2003, 16:33
Default Re: Continuity
  #3
Shiping Liu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think the solution is not convergent.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2003, 00:17
Default Re: Continuity
  #4
Alex Munoz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

The solver is given to you a solution for the condition that you impose. In other word, you must to

1) increase the number of elements 2) impose a velocity profile at the inlet 3) inpose a turbulent kinetic energy at the inlet 4) impose a dissitation rate of the TKE at the inlet. 5) Use second order upwind 6) Use Presure outlet 7) Use pressure velocity SIMPLEC

Finally, Tetrahedral mesh are characterizad for numerical diffusion. Therefore, You must to increase the number of elements per volume. Keep in mind that not too many works has been than with it, and also the ones reported are 2-D. It is my guess that yo have a large domain in 3-D.

By the way, Mr Liu coment about lack of convergence take it as a lack of convergence to the true solution not to a mathematical solution.

Regards

Alex Munoz
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2003, 06:41
Default Re: Continuity
  #5
John
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't think your comments are right at all: the mass is always conserved in finite-volume based method regardless the mesh density, mesh topology, turbulent or laminar, SIMPLE or SIMPLEC, upwind or HOD.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2003, 17:13
Default Re: Continuity
  #6
Anton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you are specifying velocity at the both the inlet and outlets of your model, then you are fixing the mass coming in and leaving, assuming constant density. Go back and double check that your inlet velocity multiplied by your inlet area is IDENTICALLY equal to your outlet velocity multiplied by your outlet area.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 20, 2003, 12:33
Default Re: Continuity
  #7
Ashish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi DAE,

Are you getting reverse flow at the outlet ?

As you don't know the exact pressure outlet bc, you try outflow bc. Run for about 100 to 200 iterations. take the total pressure value at the outlet and put it as pressure outlet bc. (i have tried this for my problem this works very well)

bye, Ashish
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2011, 01:14
Default
  #8
New Member
 
satyendra
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 7
satyendra is on a distinguished road
hi ashish,

i am trying to solve an incompressible ideal gas problem having two mass flow inlet conditions and two pressure outlet conditions ( i cannot use outflow BC since according to chapter 7, fluent user guide this is not allowed ). hence I have set target mass flow at outlet. But the continuity is not converging. any idea where i am going wrong.

rana
satyendra is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2011, 08:57
Default
  #9
New Member
 
amir mofakham
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
amir.mofakham is on a distinguished road
I think you cannot define the velocity outlet and inlet.
For example, if the velocity inlet is specified the outlet velocity is less than inlet velocity because of the drop pressure (viscosity).
So one of them can be defined and the other one will be calculated.
amir.mofakham is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09
Transient simulation not converging skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 September 17, 2007 17:48
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26.