CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 12, 2006, 10:12
Default FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #1
greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

i having some problems with my 3D beam mesh. What i am doing is trying to update my beam in fluent from displaced coordinates from my FE package. I can achieve this for small deflections using the spring analogy. however i want to model larger deflections. i have tried creating a fluid zone around the beam that i was hoping would deform as the beam deforms, but i can't get it to work!

i want the fluid zone around the beam to move in sync so that the same topology is kept. Thus when restarting the Fluent job it will continue the calculations from the previous time step with the same mesh topology.

Any ideas how i could define this region, or indeed if i actually need it?

Many thanks,

Greg
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2006, 10:46
Default Re: FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #2
Luca Cavagna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unfortunarely Fluent's spring analogy is not so robust. Try using tetrahedra mesh and if you're doing an unsteady analisys try lowering the time step. Luca
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2006, 10:59
Default Re: FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #3
greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Luca,

i am already using tet mesh and a low time step. The problem occurs when the limitations of the spring is reached. As the beam gradually bends more and more the mesh fails due to a negative volume.

thanks for your reply,

Greg
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 13, 2006, 02:29
Default Re: FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #4
Luca Cavagna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes I know. Unfortunately as said this algorithm is not robust. You should try to switch on the remeshing but I've never been able to remesh my domain when I got a negative volume. As you have already reduced the time step I'd suggest raising the number of smoothing iterations (the default is 20). This should help you. Luca
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2006, 04:16
Default Re: FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #5
greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i have already set my smoothing iterations upto 100000 and it will still fail eventually. it will work with remeshing but then i lose the topology. think i will try remeshing and see how long the next time step takes to converged. thanks again Luca
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2006, 04:30
Default Re: FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #6
Luca Cavagna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Could you explain how you succeed in remeshing? You've all tetrahedra or a hybrid grid? What kind od setting do you use for remeshing? You mean you loose topology on the beam nodes? Luca
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2006, 05:11
Default Re: FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #7
greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i have a udf that operates after every time step that updates the mesh form the FE package. I have not ran a full 3D case yet but in 2D i have an unstructured mesh. as the exterior nodes of the beam move the mesh updates itself by means of remeshing for large deflections, or smoothing if it is a small displacement. i just use the basic setting for smoothing, k=0.05, beta=1, and smoothing its= 80000 ( i just set this as a really high number). for remeshing it is all standard stuff as per the tutorials.

what happens if remeshing is used is that the cell around the beam would change, i.e lose there topology. thus when resarting the computation since the there is a new topology the time to reach convergence has increased. it some instants it is basically like making a whole new mesh again and starting from the beginning again.

is this what you are meaning?

Greg
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2006, 05:32
Default Re: FSI problem with topology of 3D beam via UDF
  #8
Luca Cavagna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
yes exactly! thank you so much for sharing these infos. I can suggest you 1 more thing: try creating some large elements as you come closer to the "far field", this may help you. This elements should take most of the deformation of the beam. What kind of deformation you have when you say "large"? Moreover try raising the far field dimension to have more space to adsorb the deformation. Luca
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
two way fsi problem_Tutorial problem kmgraju CFX 0 April 25, 2011 11:58
help debugging Beam deflection UDF josik_1982 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 December 19, 2010 18:36
comsol cantilever beam problem bhu47 Main CFD Forum 0 June 30, 2008 14:59
UDF problem on single computer with two procesor Dmitry FLUENT 3 May 18, 2005 12:44
a problem about DEFINE_GEOM in dynamic mesh UDF speedcat FLUENT 1 May 16, 2005 03:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58.