CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

must improve skewness ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 30, 2007, 21:51
Default must improve skewness ?
  #1
mario
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I have been doing a excercise on dynamic mesh, with Remesh option, I also switch on 'must improve skewness', but when I preview the mesh motion, nothing is acturally improved, the mesh is simply skewed seriously till negative mesh occured. pls help! thanks! mario
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2007, 01:08
Default Re: must improve skewness ?
  #2
pinks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Must improve skewness option says, that remesh only if skewness is improved. Anyways there are lot of parameters what decides the remeshing. If you could explain the geometrical setup and the motion, I would be in abetter condition to comment. 1.For the time being, try with lower time step.time step should be less than (gridsize/typical velocity of moving zone). 2.if you have 3D geometry, try with face remeshing, 3.Add smoothing as well. 4.try size remesh interval ->1 in dynamic mesh parameters, remeshing panel.

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2007, 03:01
Default Re: must improve skewness ?
  #3
mario
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
my geometry is just a 2D rectangular box. the left side is set as pressure inlet, the right side is set as pressure outlet. the upper and lower side is set as wall (stationary). and there is another small rectangular box move inside this big box. I set the small box and its neigbor area move as rigid body (controled by a profile), but the inlet/outlet/wall are all set to be stationary. when I do the mesh motion preview, the mesh cells beside the outlet are compressed and obviously became skew, but they never be remeshed or collapsed like with layering option. I check the UG, it says, cells with high skewness value will be marked and remeshed, but in my case, it seems nothing happen to those highly skewed cells. so, very confusing...

I add smoothing with default parameters, and change the interval to 5, 10, but the problem remains.

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2007, 08:46
Default Re: must improve skewness ?
  #4
pinks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, If you have a box inside a box, you can have quad mesh in it. Then y dont u try with layering? Y r u looking for remeshing? If you could send me your case file at the following ID i will surely solve your problem. Please clarify when you can have quad mesh y r u looking for remshing? pinkscfd@gmail.com

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2007, 10:10
Default Re: must improve skewness ?
  #5
mario
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks, pinks, i have tried quad mesh with layering, and succeed to do so. right now, i want to study remesh, so just try it with tet mesh. I will send my case to you, thanks again.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANSYS Meshing] How to improve skewness? em02131 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 9 June 5, 2013 06:19
Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM hsieh Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 32 September 13, 2011 06:50
TGrid High Skewness khimkhim ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 February 18, 2010 00:36
Severe nonorthogonality and severe skewness problem qtian OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 January 22, 2008 19:47
Skewness Taskin FLUENT 5 April 6, 2005 16:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59.