|
[Sponsors] |
|
October 2, 2008, 12:25 |
Turbulent Intensity too large!
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fluent's modeling of duct incompressible flow shows turbulent intensity about I=100-400% in regions closed to the walls, in the vortex wake after central body and outlet jet. Turbulence model is k-epsilon. Mesh is rather fine (y+=3). Pressure inlet and outlet conditions are set to I=1% and hydraulics diameter=2m.
Would you help me? |
|
October 2, 2008, 15:09 |
Re: Turbulent Intensity too large!
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What kind of mesh are you analyzing?
|
|
October 2, 2008, 21:00 |
Re: Turbulent Intensity too large!
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mesh generating fragments:
'undo begingroup' 'blayer create "bl_virtual_wall_3" first 0.0001 growth 1.2 total 0.0186688 \' 'rows 20 transition 1 trows 0 continuous' 'blayer attach "bl_virtual_wall_3" face "face_throat_1" edge "virtual_wall_3"' 'undo endgroup' ... 'face mesh "face_throat_1" triangle size 1' 'face mesh "face_throat_2" triangle size 1' 'face mesh "face_before_grid" triangle size 1' 'face mesh "face_grid" map size 1' 'face mesh "face_after_grid" map size 1' 'face mesh "face_camera" pave size 1' 'face mesh "face_dif" map size 1' 'face mesh "face_outlet" pave size 1' |
|
October 4, 2008, 05:36 |
Re: Turbulent Intensity too large!
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
May I suggest that you have a look into the reference values used in calculating the intensity as that may give you a clearer meaning of what that intensity means in your model. |
|
October 20, 2008, 13:22 |
Re: Turbulent Intensity too large!
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Friend:
Thanks for the help! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulent intensity and turbulent dissipation | Phil | FLUENT | 2 | February 14, 2018 05:06 |
Turbulent Intensity | John Haynes | Main CFD Forum | 2 | December 24, 2008 03:07 |
Specifying turbulent intensity | ken | FLUENT | 6 | June 2, 2005 02:50 |
turbulent intensity | zwdi | FLUENT | 4 | June 24, 2004 04:57 |
what is turbulent intensity? | LG.P | FLUENT | 2 | February 12, 2002 10:55 |