# porous pressure drop. Bugs?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 18, 2010, 03:32 porous pressure drop. Bugs? #1 New Member   wu Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 8 Hi, all, I am trying to simulate a case in which I include the porous media. I meet a problem: the mass flowrate from CFD is always larger than the measured data. So I did a very simple case: 1. air with variable properties flow through a pipe. 2. All the domain is porous, and I defined the permeability and inetial coefficient. Inlet: pressure and temperature outlet: pressure Then I compare the mass flowrate from FLUENT with that from Darcy-Forchheimer equation. The FLUENT software always over predict the mass flowrate. Can anybody help me explain this? overcome this problem?...... Regards,

 February 18, 2010, 17:28 #2 New Member   Susan Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 23 Rep Power: 7 And you have of course used Presto og higher order for pressure and minimum second order for momentum and calculated as double precision. Pressure drop calculations (and mass flow as in your case) is always very sensitive to how accurate you model the problem. Have you tried to change the mesh, pressure drop is also sensitive to the mesh. Mesh independant studies can easy show a difference in pressure drop on 10-20 %

 February 19, 2010, 20:25 #3 New Member   wu Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 8 Dear Susan, Thanks for your reply. But I still think there are problem with the porous model in FLUENT software. You can try like this: 1. Define the permeability and inetial coefficient (as you want). 2. define the inlet as: velocity inlet, temperature outlet: pressure 3. Compute the pressure drop in FLUENT when the case get converged 4. substitute the permeability, ineatial coefficient, viscosity, density and velocity into the "Darcy-Forchheimer" equation. You will find the pressure drop values are different. PS: you can define the air properties as: ideal gas, use the sutherland model to compute the dynamic vistosity. Regards, Wu

 February 19, 2010, 20:27 #4 New Member   wu Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 8 I am sure what I am talking about is independent on the mesh, convergence or something like that. It is because the porous model in FLUENT software has bug(s). and, if you use CFX software, you can compare the two software. You will find the porous model in CFX is right.

March 16, 2010, 13:02
porous pressure drop. Bugs?
#5
New Member

Eric
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 7
I'm also thinking something is wrong with porous medium model in Fluent. My case is different, if you compare the porous medium model results to detailed model results, the porous medium model always has lower pressure drop or lower mass flow rate if boundary conditions are the same for both models.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by whiz I am sure what I am talking about is independent on the mesh, convergence or something like that. It is because the porous model in FLUENT software has bug(s). and, if you use CFX software, you can compare the two software. You will find the porous model in CFX is right.

 March 16, 2010, 20:18 #6 New Member   wu Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 8 Dear cloudnqh, you are right! I am sure there are bugs in FLUENT about the porous model.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Jonny6001 FLUENT 0 December 19, 2009 08:36 Abdul FLUENT 2 October 28, 2008 13:13 alex CFX 0 September 20, 2007 17:31 siddiqui FLUENT 2 March 15, 2006 07:13 Fabian Main CFD Forum 1 October 19, 2001 12:46

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42.