CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Questions on Boundary Layer Spring Method for 3D Calculation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 9, 2012, 02:51
Question Questions on Boundary Layer Spring Method for 3D Calculation
  #1
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
Hello, everyone~Thanks for looking into it~
I am doing some calculation on a deforming airfoil~
As it is known, Fluent can use boundary layer spring method to deform boundary layer during a moving-deforming mesh simulations.
For 2D calculation, I used structured grid and it works well.The 10%c rear of the airfoil could flap between -10deg~10deg. 90%c of the airfoil is stationary.
Then, I extruded the 2D grid to form a 3D grid, and used the modified UDF almost the same with the 2D UDF. But after the rear flapped about 3.4deg towards the suction side, negative grids showed up. I wonder why this happens. Could the boundary layer spring method be used well for 3D calculation? Or, do I have to do some modification when I deal with 3D calculation?

Some detailed pictures are listed as followed.
Picture 1 shows the negative grids location——the same relative positions across the spanwise. We can look into it in picture 2.
For the right showed in picture 4, we can see that it seems that the grids outside the deforming airfoil are pulled towards one direction. For the left showed in picture3, as the skewness of the first grid is too big, the first layers are pushed back, and the negative grids show up.
It seems that grids around the airfoil are pulled anticlockwise as the 10%c rear(on left of the minus grids) of the airfoil flaps anticlockwise.
But for the 2D calculation, grids near the stationary part of the airfoil seems unchanged.

I am very very confused. Could anybody help me out? Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thank you all.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (37.2 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (57.2 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (24.2 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (34.3 KB, 15 views)

Last edited by didiean; January 9, 2012 at 03:24.
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2012, 02:55
Default
  #2
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
Hope I have described my questions clearly. If not, please ask me in detail~thank you.
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2012, 04:30
Default
  #3
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
In the UDF manual, there is an example of a cantilever beam which I refer to. In the UDF example, there is one line of sentence as follows:

SET_DEFORMING_THREAD_FLAG(THREAD_T0(tf));

This sentence is used to active the deforming flag on adjacent cell zone, which means that the cells adjacent to the deforming wall will also be deformed, in order to avoid skewness.

But I can't find any description of SET_DEFORMING_THREAD_FLAG. Is there anybody familiar with this?
Do I have to modify it for 3D calculation?
It seems that if this sentence doesn't work for 3D, skewness occurs. But I am not sure whether it is the reason and how to modify it.
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2012, 07:46
Default
  #4
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
For 2D calculation, there seems to be little influence on the grid development to delete this sentence. So this may not be the reason for 3D grid fail.
Any suggestion? Call for help~please
Quote:
Originally Posted by didiean View Post
In the UDF manual, there is an example of a cantilever beam which I refer to. In the UDF example, there is one line of sentence as follows:

SET_DEFORMING_THREAD_FLAG(THREAD_T0(tf));

This sentence is used to active the deforming flag on adjacent cell zone, which means that the cells adjacent to the deforming wall will also be deformed, in order to avoid skewness.

But I can't find any description of SET_DEFORMING_THREAD_FLAG. Is there anybody familiar with this?
Do I have to modify it for 3D calculation?
It seems that if this sentence doesn't work for 3D, skewness occurs. But I am not sure whether it is the reason and how to modify it.
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 10, 2012, 22:19
Default
  #5
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
Has anyone ever used the boundary layer spring method for 3D calculation?Please help me~~
As the User Guide says, the spring-based smoothing method on non-triangular or non-tetrahedral cell zones is turned off by default. But why is the boundary layer influenced by spring constant factor when I haven't activated spring-on-all-shapes?
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2012, 04:26
Default
  #6
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
Has anyone used spring dynamic method for 3D structured model? I am still stuck~
Call for help~
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2012, 03:24
Default
  #7
Member
 
Satish Gupta
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Rahul123 is on a distinguished road
I m modelling a 2d dynamic mesh problem.Cells adjacent to boundarys only deform.Can u tell me how to deform the entire domain?
Rahul123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2012, 05:37
Default
  #8
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahul123 View Post
I m modelling a 2d dynamic mesh problem.Cells adjacent to boundarys only deform.Can u tell me how to deform the entire domain?
You can define the entire domain as Deforming type.
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2012, 05:53
Default
  #9
Member
 
Satish Gupta
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Rahul123 is on a distinguished road
I have done that but only the cell layer adjacent to the rotating boundary is deforming.I dont knw wat the problem is
Rahul123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2012, 05:59
Default
  #10
Member
 
Satish Gupta
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Rahul123 is on a distinguished road
Its a rotating square 2d problem.I have divided the mesh into two zones.Square is surrounded by a circular mesh zone which is rotating with the cylinder.The left over domain is made deforming but as I said the cells adjacent to the circular zone is only deforming which I guess is causing the divergence after some time steps(150-200).What should I do?I m using smoothing and remeshing
Rahul123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2012, 07:16
Default
  #11
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahul123 View Post
Its a rotating square 2d problem.I have divided the mesh into two zones.Square is surrounded by a circular mesh zone which is rotating with the cylinder.The left over domain is made deforming but as I said the cells adjacent to the circular zone is only deforming which I guess is causing the divergence after some time steps(150-200).What should I do?I m using smoothing and remeshing
I haven't quite followed you. Maybe, you could attach some pictures.
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2012, 09:35
Default mesh pics
  #12
Member
 
Satish Gupta
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Rahul123 is on a distinguished road
[ATTACH]mesh2.jpg[/ATTACH]
these are the pics
Attached Images
File Type: gif mesh1.gif (95.5 KB, 8 views)
Rahul123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2012, 09:36
Default
  #13
Member
 
Satish Gupta
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Rahul123 is on a distinguished road
only 1 cell is deforming...others are intact
Rahul123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 28, 2012, 02:47
Default
  #14
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahul123 View Post
only 1 cell is deforming...others are intact
I am not sure about the reason. Try to modify the parameters of remeshing.
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2014, 06:32
Default hello
  #15
New Member
 
Zeli Zhang
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
zheli_piglet is on a distinguished road
hello didiean,

Did you finally manage to figure out how to set deforming flag on adjacent cell zone? I've met with the same problem? It will be nice if you could offer me some hints...thanks a lot!

Julie
zheli_piglet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2014, 22:09
Default
  #16
Member
 
Felix
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 6
didiean is on a distinguished road
I couldn't recall how I solve it. I might have set some parts of the domains or boundaries as rigid. Hope it helps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zheli_piglet View Post
hello didiean,

Did you finally manage to figure out how to set deforming flag on adjacent cell zone? I've met with the same problem? It will be nice if you could offer me some hints...thanks a lot!

Julie
didiean is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
3 dimension, boundary layer, spring method

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 34 October 16, 2014 05:27
[GAMBIT] Calculation of boundary layer thickness aamer ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 October 27, 2010 12:34
Boundary layer generation problems ivan_cozza OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 October 6, 2010 13:47
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55
New topic on same subject - Flow around race car Tudor Miron CFX 15 April 2, 2004 06:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:43.