CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

benefits of c-meshing ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 25, 2012, 09:46
Default benefits of c-meshing ?
  #1
New Member
 
Umut Can
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 4
Umuteng is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

For 2-d flow over airfoil analysis what is the advantage of c-meshed domain over the unstructured meshing options?

Best regards...
Umuteng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2012, 12:28
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 387
Rep Power: 6
cdegroot is on a distinguished road
Using quadrilateral elements rather than triangular elements is more accurate when using finite volume methods. I'm not sure how much you know about the disretization details, but if you take a line that connects the centroid of two adjacent volumes it does not in general pass through the integration point on the cell face and you will have to apply corrections to get to the right point. If the grid is orthogonal this line passes directly through the integration point, so no correction necessary. The more closely orthogonal the mesh, the smaller this correction will be and the more accurate your results will be (in general).

Also, triangular/tetrahedral meshes don't do as good of a job of resolving boundary layers as quad/hex meshes since the grid lines are in not aligned with the flow.
cdegroot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2012, 08:36
Default
  #3
Member
 
Ford Prefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 8
Ford Prefect is on a distinguished road
Probably the ease of mesh generation (if you have a more complex geometry), and number of generated cells?

However, you still need to apply a correction in structured body-fitted meshing since you need to calculate a Jacobian. How this affects accuracy compared to the unstructured form of correction should be interesting to know.

I agree on the boundary layer treatment, it poses some additional problems if you use triangular elements in that region.
__________________
"Trying is the first step to failure." - Homer Simpson
Ford Prefect is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2012, 17:51
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Umut Can
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 4
Umuteng is on a distinguished road
thank you guys, however i think i need more detailed information so could you advice any papers which is related to this phenomena ?
Umuteng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2012, 19:06
Default
  #5
Member
 
vicarious's Avatar
 
Pedram Mojtabavi
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 6
vicarious is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to vicarious
Because of the accuracy needed for flow prediction close to the walls, specially for an airfoil with high pressure gradients, It is more common to use and structured mesh around these complex geometries. You can produce an uniform cells down to walls and control the Y+ much easier. It also saves time and memory more than unstructured grids. Briefly, boundary layer resolving is much more accurate. Maybe you find the attachment below useful.
http://www.4shared.com/office/an7yoH...rid_Types.html
vicarious is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2012, 19:27
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Umut Can
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 4
Umuteng is on a distinguished road
thank you very much for informations, and document you share...
Umuteng is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANSYS Meshing] Can I use ANSYS Meshing for manual meshing? Kirjain ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 3 June 12, 2012 08:35
[ANSYS Meshing] Migrating from GAMBIT to ANSYS Meshing David-CFD ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 April 1, 2011 05:22
Meshing locks workbench window. andy2o CFX 0 February 1, 2008 06:01
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing Ken Main CFD Forum 0 September 4, 2003 11:09
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid ken FLUENT 0 September 4, 2003 11:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10.