|
[Sponsors] |
Implicit, high-order methods for Incompressible NS |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 26, 2007, 16:13 |
Implicit, high-order methods for Incompressible NS
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hey all,
I am just curious as to how one would develop an implicit solver for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, with finite differences to handle the spatial derivatives. I am quite familiar with methods for ODEs (like backward Euler, Adams-Bashford/Adams-Moulton, BDFs, RKs, etc.). I have also seen the usual explicit Eulerian approach to solving NS, which differs from how one would solve an ODE. I am talking about the explicit method presented by Griebel, Dornseifer, Neunhoeffer in their book "Numerical Simulation in Fluid Dynamics". They way they describe it, one would take a forward-Euler step, and then solve the Poisson equation for pressure to make the system divergence-free. I can't seem to find any decent explanations of how NS is solved with implicit methods, or with higher-order methods. I can think of two ways, but haven't been able to find info on either one of them. Either there is a way to reduce NS to an ODE, or there are special methods (like the explicit one by Griebel et al.) that only work with NS. So, am I missing something? Can someone point me to some info? Thanks. Dave |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! | Far | CFX | 9 | May 31, 2011 08:21 |
High order elements | pankos | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 1, 2011 08:56 |
High order FVM scheme .... | cfd_newbie | FLUENT | 0 | February 4, 2008 13:43 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 18:28 |
ONLINE: literature on IMPLICIT FINITE DIFFERENCE METHODS | Yogesh Talekar | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 28, 1999 09:54 |