CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

FASTRAN: how good is it?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 14, 2000, 09:59
Default FASTRAN: how good is it?
  #1
Pedro M.M.L.Gabriel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello!

I will work in a project with CFDRC FASTRAN. I would like to know if anyone has work with it, what kind of aplications and if the results are valid.

Thanks for your help.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2000, 11:23
Default Re: FASTRAN: how good is it?
  #2
Alton J. Reich, P.E.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Pedro,

I think FASTRAN is an excellent code for high speed aerodynamic analysis, but I work for CFD Research Corp, so I may be a bit biased

FASTRAN is a mature, well validated code that has been used in the areospace industry for a (in CFD terms) long time. There are numerous examples of work we have done with FASTRAN on our web site at <http://www.cfdrc.com>

If you would like more information about a specific application, or more details about validation of the code, let me know and I'll get you the additional information.

Regards, Alton
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2000, 13:06
Default Re: FASTRAN: how good is it?
  #3
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i don't know about FASTRAN but a colleague of mine who's used both fluent and CFDRC'c cfd ace+ says he much prefers the cfdrc product as it is easier to learn and pre-processing is quicker and easier.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2000, 15:46
Default Re: FASTRAN: how good is it?
  #4
Pedro M.M.L.Gabriel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Alton,

I am working in a store release type of aplication, in a small jet trainer. I need to simulate the entire aircraft. I need to know what kind of hardware do you recommend, and details of the validation of results in that kind of aplication.

Regards,Pedro
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2000, 15:47
Default Re: FASTRAN: how good is it?
  #5
Pedro M.M.L.Gabriel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cliford,

Thanks for your help.

Regards, Pedro
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 17, 2000, 04:24
Default Re: FASTRAN: how good is it?
  #6
frank
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We use CFD-RC FASTRAN and FLUENT in missile design, i.e. we use both codes at higher mach numbers. Each Program have his own advatages. FASTRAN caculate, iterate and get convergence very fast. Fluent is easy to use in Pre- and Post- postprocessing. Fluent is a more reliable tool in comparisson to FASTRAN. It works on every hardware plattform and we have no trouble with big grids. FASTRAN have in contrast to fluent great problems with large numbers of blocks (beyond 250 blocks) and large grids (beyond 1 million cells). It also need to mach working time to define the problem, i.e. boundary conditions. In accordance with CFD-RC, the general handling of the code will be improve with a new GUI. So we are hopefull to get a more quicker handling of FASTRAN
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good book for heat transfer + FEA? Bren Main CFD Forum 0 November 24, 2008 20:54
Good convergence but without a good heat balance Juan Martin Catelén CFX 4 June 27, 2007 18:41
Good fundamentals book of CFD & computational aero zaidun CFX 0 April 13, 2006 22:53
A good question about UDS Z FLUENT 1 March 31, 2005 15:14
CFX bought by Ansys - good or bad?! Pete CFX 38 February 21, 2003 08:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30.