|
[Sponsors] |
March 3, 2000, 05:32 |
PISO vs. SIMPLEC
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
I'm running a steady state incompressible turbulent flow problem and decided to try PISO instead of SIMPLEC and discovered that the oscillations in the residuals were reduced. Is there anybody that can support the conclusion that PISO might be more suitable for this kind of problem? (PISO was originally developed for transient compressible flow) Regards Andreas |
|
March 4, 2000, 02:18 |
Re: PISO vs. SIMPLEC
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello Andreas
Try: D.S.Jang , R.Jetly, S.Acharya. (Luisiana State Univ.) "Comparison of the PISO, SIMPLER, and SIMPLEC algorithms for the treatment of the pressure-velocity coupling in Steady flow problems", Journal: Numerical Heat Transfer, vol.10, pp.209-28, 1986. Best regards, Evgueny |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIMPLEC vs. PISO | Andreas Abdon | CFX | 4 | October 12, 2009 01:49 |
PISO 50 with discarge coeff down??? | Andrea | Siemens | 1 | February 1, 2008 13:33 |
Please Answer (PISO) | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 14, 2005 03:12 |
PISO - new questions | Benedikt Flurl | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 7, 2005 12:02 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 06:54 |