|
[Sponsors] |
January 24, 2008, 21:00 |
PISO 50 with discarge coeff down???
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everybody,
when I simulate a Diesel ICE I get these results with a discarghe coeff Cd = 0.825: when I use underela = 0.7, scalar underela = 0.5 and drnp = 0.35 I get maximum PISO = 12 from the time of start of injection (SOI) til the end of combustion. Instead, when I use Cd = 0.7 I get PISO > 50 many times at the start of combustion...and PISO < 12 after the start of the combustion...what is a possible reason in your opinion??? I've see the when the Sauter Mean Diameter drop under 10 micron (when Cd go down velocity rise up...) I get PISO > 50...but with the Lagrangian approach it should be better that the droplet is much low compared to the cell...where am I wrong? And also...I've tried to run with time step at 1/10 of the original, also with underela = 0.5, underela of scalar = 0.3 and drnp = 0.1...I always get the same results! Plase share your ideas! Regards |
|
February 1, 2008, 14:33 |
Re: PISO 50 with discarge coeff down???
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
nobody has any idea about this problem???
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
piso | dontknow | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 21, 2006 10:01 |
PISO | newposter | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 15, 2006 07:20 |
Help with PISO | Beni | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 30, 2005 11:02 |
Inertia Coeff. | Sham | FLUENT | 0 | May 2, 2005 00:57 |
Plot drag coeff,lift coeff VS angle of attack | John | FLUENT | 2 | August 29, 2003 14:06 |