CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 22, 2000, 11:36
Default help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #1
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Is no-slip condition valid at the wall all the time? If I have a very "slippery" wall such as teflon, is it still valid to apply no-slip at the wall. If not, what is appropriate to model it?

Thanks!

Pei-Ying
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2000, 11:55
Default Re: help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #2
David Hunt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Pei-Ying,

based on my understanding of kinetic theory, I believe that no-slip will always apply at the boundary between a fluid and a solid.

Particles in the fluid will collide with particles in the solid at the interface. For a solid to be solid, the solid particles will remain in place. This creates a layer at the wall where the average fluid particle velocity will be zero.

Teflon has low friction when rubbed by another solid, but the above argument still applies to fluids. For no-slip to fail, the surface would need to be a non-solid (whatever that means).

David Hunt
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2000, 11:59
Default Re: help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #3
Sergei Chernyshenko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, Pei-Ying,

No-slip condition is believed to be valid as far as the characteristic scale of the flow is much greater than the mean length of the path of the fluid molecular between collisions.

The wall material does not matter as far as it is rigid.

Rgds, Sergei.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2000, 14:48
Default Re: help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #4
C.S.Venkat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There is some doubt as to whether the no-slip condition is valid for Low Reynold's number flows. Simple physical examples are sufficient to convince oneself that this is true. A single drop of water may slide down a slippery surface. Intuitively one knows that capillary, viscous and gravitational forces are involved and that a simple newtonian law for viscosity will not work here.

I recall some research published a few years ago in which correlations of various "slip conditions" were made with experiment, for airlows. In summary, low Reynolds flows or Rare-fied gas flows present problems of special interest and difficulty where present day physical models are inadequate.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2000, 19:04
Default Re: help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #5
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1).Even the material like teflon (a commercial product), does not slip off the surface of a pan. (2). So, it is non-slip.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2000, 10:36
Default Re: help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #6
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Thank everyone for the info. I think it comes to an agreement that the "no-slip" condition fails under rare-fied gas condition. Mr. Venkat also mentioned "no-slip" fails under low Reynolds number condition. Could you please shed some more light on this? What range the Re # is?

The problem I am interested is oil flow in a small ID Teflon tube.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2000, 11:16
Default Re: help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #7
C.S.Venkat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I did read about this in a paper some years ago. I forget exactly in which Journal, but it is either the AIAA Journal or the "Journal of Aircraft". The conditions are very specialized, and the Reynolds number range is narrow. Sorry I could not shed more light on this. I cannot of course vouch for the correctness of those published results, and so you should proceed with caution here.

Cheers,

C.S.Venkat
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2000, 10:51
Default Re: help: Is "no-slip" valid all the time?
  #8
Sergei Chernyshenko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh, I am sorry, I forgot about this. Thanks Mr. Venkat for reminding. Indeed, there is a well-known problem of a moving contact line. With no-slip boundary condition a contact line cannot move which contradicts everyday observation. This is indeed low-Re staff. Look at

http://www.mat.bham.ac.uk/J.Billingham/mpf.htm

for further references. Search with Altavista on 'moving contact line' can also produce something interesting.

Sergei.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time step size and max iterations per time step pUl| FLUENT 24 January 16, 2014 06:35
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 bookie56 OpenFOAM Installation 8 August 13, 2011 04:03
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 14:09
Modeling in micron scale using icoFoam m9819348 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 October 27, 2007 00:36
unsteady calcs in FLUENT Sanjay Padhiar Main CFD Forum 1 March 31, 1999 11:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:42.