CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

recirculation at low Reynolds number

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 22, 2000, 11:16
Default recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #1
Steven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all! I'm quite new to this forum, but am actually looking for experimental or computational results pertaining to the classical case of flow past a square cylinder at low Reynolds number. I need to verify my own computational results with established ones, but could not seem to find any which contains stable recirculating wake region with NO vortex shedding (Re at 30 ?). Anyway, I got my results with no recirculation zones at Re 30, so I guess I must be wrong somewhere. Pls advise me.

Thx a lot!

Stiff
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2000, 11:49
Default Re: recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #2
Sebastien Perron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Go to http://www.featflow.de/
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2000, 15:32
Default Re: recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #3
Adrin Gharakhani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For a bluff body (such as the square) you should get an aft-end "recirculation" due to "separation", even at modest Re. You may not see this effect if you are in the Stokes flow regime where Re << 1! In the latter case, the streamlines (but not necessarily the complete physical picture) will look more like that of potential flow over the bluff body.

So, I'd suggest that you check your results for grid-independence. It appears to me that, if the code and its implementation are bug-free, you have substantial numerical diffusion; so much so that your Re is reduced from your desired value of 30 to the actual computational value of O(1)!

If you find evidence to the contrary please share your findings with us.

Adrin Gharakhani
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2000, 23:42
Default Re: recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #4
Steven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How so, will I have numerical diffusion as to alter the Reynolds number to a much lower value? In fact, one of my worries was the implication of a higher kinematic viscosity, thus causing unnecessary "sluggishness". Please advise. Thx!
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2000, 17:52
Default Re: recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #5
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
try the "Album of Fluid Mechanics" which has a lot of pictures of (very) low Re flows. You should be able to find a refeerence there. You should be able to get a non-shedding recirculation zone at some Re. What kind of scheme have you implemented in your code?
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2000, 21:59
Default Re: recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #6
Steven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm actually doing a very prelimnary test for my algorithm, after which I'll need to use more complicated schemes and composite grids. Thus I need to get my algortihm correct first before I can continue. Now I'm using the Leapfrog(time)- Dufort Frankel explicit scheme.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2000, 01:31
Default Re: recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #7
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). For algorithm and code development, there are several standard test cases to validate the solution. (2). These are: 2-D channel flow or fully developed channel flow, sudden expansion channel flow or flow over a back step, square cavity flow with a moving lid, flow over a 2-D cylinder. These cases have been studied over 25 years at least, so, you should be able to find the references quite easily.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2000, 18:29
Default Re: recirculation at low Reynolds number
  #8
Adrin Gharakhani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you are using a low order (diffusive) method with coarse grids, then you can reduce your effective Reynolds number substantially. There is no way to quantify it for me. Anyway, first do a grid-independence test, and I agree with John Chien, try the standard benchmark tests (the step channel problem is a very good one). Also, the problem you are solving is external flow, you'll have to make sure that your "outer" boundaries are far enough, as they have significant impact on your flow field. (On the other hand, you may be capturing the correct physics ) but you won't know it without good experiments and parametric test of convergence of your results)

Adrin Gharakhani
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence model for low Reynolds number flow? Nokadu Main CFD Forum 3 May 26, 2013 11:42
Low Reynolds Number Drag Law - UDF Daggemann FLUENT 0 April 30, 2009 05:02
Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15
Experimental data for fence at low Reynolds number Kim Bindesboll Andersen Main CFD Forum 1 September 26, 2002 13:54
Low Reynolds number for airfoil Richard Main CFD Forum 1 March 20, 2000 08:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36.