CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Far Field Boundary Conditions

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 15, 1998, 07:42
Default Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #1
Xavi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I am looking forward to implement an open boundary (far field boundary condition) in an unstructured code which does not account for these situations. I am looking for some information )papers or simmilar) which could help me on this task.

Does anybody know any references concerning the subject???
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 1998, 02:13
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #2
P.Jawahar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Boundary conditions depend upon lots of things; please be specific so that any suggestion would be meaningful.

However, some of the papers ( I had posted a reference list sometime ago ) will give you far field boundary conditions for the solution of compressible inviscid/viscous flow problems on unstructured grids. Jawahar

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 1998, 06:01
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #3
Xavi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry I didn't make myself clear. I am trying to implement an open boundary condition in an unstructured code. My aim is to study the air flow around a standard NACA airfoil and I want to do it, not in a wind tunnel, like a closed boundary will give me, but on an open air boundary. I am aiming to reduce considerably the size of my domain. At the moment, I need to simulate it under a domain of 50!!! times the chord of the arfoil so the closed boundary effect can be minimized. Any suggestion will be welcomed. Thankjs very much, Jawahar
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 1998, 07:15
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #4
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I would use absorbing boundary conditions (Riemann based). The standard reference is a Jameson paper... I haven't got it available here but do a search on "Jameson" in this forum (or the forum archive) and I think you'll find it - I have a vague memory that this has been discussed here previously.

The extent of the computational domain should be at least 10 times the chord, preferably 20, even with this kind of boundary conditions. With an unstructured code this shouldn't be a problem though since you can expand the cells further away from the object.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 1998, 11:47
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #5
Uma Maheswari
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If your aim is to reduce the size of the computational domain the paper "Global far-field computational boundary conditions for C and O grid topologies" by A.Verhoff in AIAA Journal, Vol.36, No.2, pp. 148-156, may be useful for you. Whether structured or unstructured the concepts are same.

Hope this helps.

Uma
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 1998, 18:25
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #6
Duane Baker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I did a serch with Jameson....and nothing other than a post from a discussion on Density time marching based methods vs pressure based methods......so it must have expired!

Can you find any more details on this Jameson paper??

Thanks............................................ .Duane
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 1998, 01:25
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #7
P.Jawahar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try the following far-field boundary conditions. I find it very effective for both structured and unstructured grid computations. You may locate the outer boundary between 8-12 chords. Again, you can try a couple of numerical experiments to fix the outer boundary ! I've assumed you are using circle as the outer boundary !

Create an extra ring of cells beyond the last ring of cells.

For free-stream Mach number less than 1: ---------------------------------------

Prescribe asymptotic far-field solutions in those cells. i.e uniform flow on which is superimposed the circulatory flow caused by a point vortex at the mid-point of the airfoil's chord. The instantaneous circulation GAMMA at the airfoil decides the strength of the vortex. The flow induced by the vortex is then computed from small perturbation theory after including the compressibility effects (Prandtl-Glauert transformation). (Also refer to " Foundations of Aerodynamics " by Kuethe & Chow)

For supersonic free-stream Mach numbers, just prescribe the free-stream values in the outer ring cells.

Everything I've stated applies to cell-vertex methods also. You can prescribe these conditions at points lying on the outer circle.

Good Luck ! Jawahar
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 1998, 06:26
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #8
Xavi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks very much indeed for your kindness and interest. Your advices have been extremly useful. XAVI
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 1998, 09:11
Default Re: Far Field Boundary Conditions
  #9
Brian Gribben
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
To complement Jawahar's posting, I think you would find the following paper very useful :

J.L. Thomas and M.D. Salas "Far-Field Boundary Conditions for Transonic Lifting Solutions to the Euler Equations", AIAA Journal, July 1996, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp 1074-1080.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proper Pressure Boundary Conditions for Buoyant Flow mchurchf OpenFOAM 0 March 25, 2010 13:16
how to give boundary conditions:-calculated type of primitive boundary field suniljain OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 March 20, 2010 01:19
Update boundary conditions calculated by an external program CedricVH OpenFOAM 2 January 15, 2010 12:55
Problem with rhoSimpleFoam matteo_gautero OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 28, 2008 07:51
Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 July 15, 2005 04:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43.