CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Couplet vs. segregated Methods

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 19, 2002, 09:06
Default Couplet vs. segregated Methods
  #1
Roued
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I have a simpel question about the solution process involved in modern CFD methods.

Both commercial and non-commercial CFD codes are often divided about which method to use.

Some perfer couplet method for compressible flows, since they are more robust and faster. This is based on a number of papers descriping

But what about incompressible internal flows ?

Some people claim that there is hardly any difference between couplet and segregated (simple-like, Piso) methods !

Especially in flows involving buoyancy.

If we take a look at commercial code: CFX5 only has a couplet solver, Fluent has both, but as far as I know most peopel uses the segregated solver in Fluent. Star-cd has a segregated solver, also and is going to have a coupled solver in the next version. But they only recomment it for compressibel flow.

Please comment ?

Kind Regards

Roued

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2002, 04:54
Default Re: Couplet vs. segregated Methods
  #2
Rami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Roued,

I have recently read a paper describing a unified approach (using FEM):

S. Mittal, T. Tezduyar, " A Unified Finite Element Formulation for Compressible and Incompressible Flows using Augmented Conservation Variables", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 161 (1998), pp 229-243.

Judging from their results, their "blending" approach is successful.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2002, 16:25
Default Re: Couplet vs. segregated Methods
  #3
Neale
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Properly implemented, the coupled approach is ultimately more robust and scalable than segregated. Segregated solvers scale as O(N^2), where as coupled algebraic multigrid solvers scale as O(N). It is quite well known that the coupled solver in Fluent does not work well, and has a limited feature matrix compared with teh segregated solver. I think this is largely a naive implementation issue more than anything else, and not reflective of the behaviour of coupled solvers in general.

The coupled solver in CFX-5 works on both compressible and incompressible flows. There is no option to choose a segregated mode. It's been working fine this way for several years now, and for even longer than that in CFX-TASCflow. I think the fact that Star and Fluent are both attempting to implement a coupled solver is as a result of their realisation that it is the future of solvers in commercial CFD. Very smart people working for Fluent and Star started work on their coupled solvers when they realised how well it was working in CFX-TASCflow. CFX has been using this technology for years now and is simply too far ahead with it for Fluent and Star to catch up in this particular area.

Neale.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Implicit, high-order methods for Incompressible NS Dave Rudolf Main CFD Forum 10 January 29, 2007 11:13
Convergence Definition of Segregated Solver Amir FLUENT 0 April 18, 2006 07:21
Why Segregated method is still being used? Sam Main CFD Forum 40 July 25, 2005 04:07
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 19:28
Projection methods ZY Sun Main CFD Forum 9 September 15, 2000 19:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:02.