CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Question in CFD

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 6, 2009, 14:08
Default Question in CFD
  #1
shosho
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi freinds

I have this equation

\frac{1}{R} \frac{\partial u}{ \partial \xi} + \frac{u}{( \xi R+ R_{2} )} + \frac{\partial w}{\partial z} - \frac{1}{R} \frac{\partial w}{\partial \xi} (\xi\frac{\partial R}{ \partial z}+ \frac{\partial R_{2}}{\partial z})= 0



which comes from continuty equation

\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}+ \frac{u}{r}+ \frac{\partial w}{\partial z} = 0

and the radial coordinate transformation

\xi= \frac{r-R_{2}}{R_{1}- R_{2}}= \frac{r-R_{2}}{R}

my question now how I can get the first equation? I mean what the steps to get it by using the continuty equ and transformation?


Kind Regards
Shosho
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 2009, 23:02
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Ananda Himansu
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
Ananda Himansu is on a distinguished road
I will refer to your equations as (1), (2) and (3). You are transforming independent coordinates from (r, z) to (xi, zeta), where xi is given by your eqn (3) and zeta = z. The dependents u and w were previously functions of r & z, and are now functions of xi & zeta. R1 and R2 (and also R1-R2) are functions of z, and thus of zeta, but are independent of r and of xi. Recognize that when transforming your original continuity eqn (2), you must now treat w as a function of xi and zeta, but the derivative is with respect to z while holding r constant. Apply the chain rule for this derivative (dw/dz = dw/dzeta*dzeta/dz + dw/dxi*dxi/dz) and you get your transformed continuity eqn (1), noting that all occurrences of z in (1) are really zeta and that the derivative dw/dzeta is now holding xi constant (not r). The first two terms in (2) get trivially transformed to the first two terms of (1).

Last edited by Ananda Himansu; August 6, 2009 at 23:07. Reason: distinguished between dw/dz in eqns (1) and (2)
Ananda Himansu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2009, 09:58
Default
  #3
shosho
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Ananda Himansu

Dear friends, one of my friends send me this solution but unfortunatlly i didn't understand it . Can you please One explain it to me?.


1. \xi = \xi(r, R_1, R_2)

2. R_1 = R_1(z,t) and R_2 = R_2(z,t), hence (3. & 4. hold):
3. u(r , z , t) = u(\xi , z , t),

4. w(r , z , t) = w(\xi , z , t) so that (5. & 6. hold):

5. u_r = u_{\xi} * \xi_r (from 3.)

6. w_z = w_{\xi} * \xi_z + w_z (from 4.)

formulas 5. and 6. should answer your question!


Kind Regards
Shosho
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASME CFD Symposium - Call for Papers Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 September 25, 2001 10:17
ASME CFD Symposium Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2001 06:41
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 21:10
Is CFD Science or Art ? John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 October 5, 1999 12:58
salary range Frank Muldoon Main CFD Forum 7 August 3, 1998 19:04


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:25.