# how to understand high resolution scheme and high order scheme

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 27, 2010, 22:52 how to understand high resolution scheme and high order scheme #1 Member   L.Y LIN Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 47 Rep Power: 8 hi guys ,can you help me to understand what is the difference between the high resolution scheme and high order scheme in details.i am confused.in some cases are they the same ?if i use coarse meshes ,what do high order scheme and low order scheme mean to me?and what do high resolution scheme and low resolution scheme mean to me?

 September 28, 2010, 21:08 #2 New Member   Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 16 Rep Power: 8 Hi, Here is my understanding: 1. The term, 'high-resolution', means 2nd-order or higher accuracy and no oscillations (primarily focusing on applications to shock waves, in comparison with monotone but too dissipative 1st-order schemes which is low-resolution). 2. The term, 'high-order', means simply 3rd-order or higher accuracy. I guess the term 'high-resolution' is obsolete these days since many existing codes use 'high-resolution' schemes. By the same logic, the term 'high-order' may become obsolete in future. bjohn

 September 29, 2010, 14:30 #3 Member   ganesh Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 40 Rep Power: 9 Dear Lin, Resolution refers to error on a given grid and accuracy refers to error decay on a sequence of grids. A high resolution scheme can have a lower order accuracy, but yield much smaller errors on a given mesh, on which a higher order scheme might give larger errors. While it is true that these terms ar eoften used interchangably and loosely in literature, resolution has to do more with ability of the scheme to resolve all wave numbers on a given mesh. You could probably look into equaivalent wave number concepts and finite difference schemes to get a more clearer picture. Hope this helps. Ganesh

 September 30, 2010, 10:43 #4 Member   Jed Brown Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 56 Rep Power: 11 The term "high resolution" in this context was (I think) coined by Ami Harten in 1983. Broadly speaking, "high resolution" refers to non-oscillatory methods of order 2 or higher (in smooth regions, no method can be more than first order in L^1 for discontinuous solutions). In short, bjohn's answer is correct. "High order" typically refers to any method of order 2 or higher (usually 3 or higher for elliptic problems with nice coefficients), including those that are oscillatory. Sometimes "very high order" is used specifically for methods of at least third order. I do not agree that "high order" will ever become obsolete, and "high resolution" is still very much used, although sometimes people use the more specific TVD (Total Variation Diminishing, almost always refers to a second order method because no TVD method can have order higher than 2) and TVB (Total Variation Bounded, includes higher order methods like (W)ENO that are not TVD, but are still very much usable for shocks).

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post realanony87 CFX 1 November 10, 2015 11:36 gravis ANSYS 3 March 24, 2011 03:43 vijay CFX 1 April 22, 2008 09:37 cfd_newbie FLUENT 0 February 4, 2008 14:43 LiQiang Main CFD Forum 1 May 9, 2005 13:50

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04.