CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Turbulence Model, truck aerodynamics

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 23, 2010, 09:15
Default Turbulence Model, truck aerodynamics
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
helena is on a distinguished road
I am running simulations for external aerodynamics for trucks. Until now I have run RANS simulations using the realizable k-epsilon turbulence model. I am currently looking in more detail into the flow field around the cab side extenders and the roof deflector, also what is happening downstream if these are removed. I am thinking of trying the k-omega SST model. My thought is that this model perhaps would be less "viscous" and would not tend to smudge the flow field as much as the k-eplison models. What are your experiences regarding this dilemma? Can anyone please give me some advice about an appropriate turbulence model for this application?
helena is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2010, 05:51
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 8
gerritgroot is on a distinguished road
There's a conceptual difference in how k-w approximates the boundary layer if I remember well (using wall functions or not). In my experience, k-e converges much better. Since you're not interested in the boundary layer, I'd run it with k-e first.

Anyway, simulating these highly separated flows in CFD will never give you a proper result, sorry! And if it does it's a pure coincidence. No matter what is being said on this forum by CFD believers. (It will give you good resutls in neat attached flow nevertheless)

You will have to run windtunnel measurements to see the difference or start driving with both options and measure your fuel use. A long and tedious task (both of them actually)

There's a great book on that subject you're working on:
"Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles: From Fluid Mechanics to Vehicle Engineering" from Wolf-Heinrich Hucho. Reading that can safe you a lot of work in options that are destined for underperformance.
gerritgroot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2010, 04:44
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
helena is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your reply, gerritgroot!

Yes I am aware of the limitations of turbulence modeling. Comparing to wind tunnel tests or road tests are of course a good alternative to confirm the results obtained by CFD. Thanks a lot for your recommendations and your time.
helena is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2010, 05:29
jola's Avatar
Jonas Larsson
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 10
jola is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to jola Send a message via Skype™ to jola
The SST k-omega model tends to be less diffusive than the Realizable k-eps model (Shih's model as implented in Fluent I assume you mean). Which model works best is dependent on the application. The SST k-omega model is more separation prone and predicts more secondary flow with less overall diffused results. This can be good in some cases, but it can also mean unrealisticly large wakes and separations that occur much too early. You need validation for your application to select between these two models. Both are good but both have weaknesses.
jola is offline   Reply With Quote


external flow, trucks, turbulence model

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 12 June 2, 2015 13:16
Adding a Turbulence Model doug OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 October 2, 2012 06:55
KOmega Turbulence model from wwwopenFOAMWikinet philippose OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 August 4, 2010 10:26
question about turbulence model selection and sensitivity karananand Main CFD Forum 1 February 26, 2010 05:41
SSG Reynolds Turbulence Model Georges CFX 1 February 28, 2007 17:15

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57.