|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi,
I am currently writing a small tool which helps me to set up blade geometries in a turbomachine. In order to define the blade camberlines, I am using either a m' / theta (m' = m_prime) or a m/r*theta (m = meridional coordinate) coordinate system. I found both definitions in the handbook of Mises (Drela). Now, I am asking myself which coordinate system is more senseful. I know that some "comercial" tools prefer the m'/theta-definition because it shell be angle-preserving - but why is this not the case with m/r*theta? Can this be proven mathematically? Is the m'/theta coordinate-system senseful if the fluid is _not_ following a streamline (e.g. in a deswirler which turns the flow from radial to axial), as described in the mises manual? Thx for the help. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where to find airfoils with more coordinates pts? | KB | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 24, 2008 00:18 |
| Turbomachinery at OpenFOAM Workshop Milan 2008 | hani | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 21, 2008 03:33 |
| working in cylindrical coordinates in fluent | Randheer Yadav | FLUENT | 1 | February 17, 2005 07:03 |
| Coordinate's tranformation | tommy | FLUENT | 0 | February 13, 2004 02:19 |
| Calculation in cylindrical coordinates | Franz Wingelhofer | CFX | 0 | December 28, 1999 07:46 |