CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Ground Effect

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 26, 2012, 08:31
Default Ground Effect
  #1
New Member
 
Will
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
willis is on a distinguished road
I am trying to model the flow around a cambered airfoil, taking ground effect into consideration.

Can anybody tell me how I would specify the right conditions for my lower boundary (the ground) in fluent, i.e a velocity and no slip condition?

Thanks very much for any help.
willis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 09:29
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 234
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 8
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
You can put no-slip on the ground, but ground must move together with airflow, if your airfoil is stationary in fluent. Or simpler solution could be to put "reflection" of your airfoil in the ground and analyse double airfoil problem.

Truffaldino
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 10:26
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Will
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
willis is on a distinguished road
Thanks Truffaldino,

I know that the ground needs to be given the same velocity as the flow, I just do not know how to do this in fluent. When defining my boundary conditions, if i select wall is there an option to specify a velocty as well?
willis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 11:23
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 234
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 8
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Hi Willis,

I have never used fluent with no-slip on moving surface, but I think fluent has something as "moving wall" bc. Just put the speed of wall to be equal to that of air at the inlet.

But I still think putting extra "reflection airfoil" is better solution of the problem.

Truffaldino
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 16:32
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Out of curiosity, is the interest in race car aerodynamics, i.e. inverted cambered front wing of F1, or airplane ground effects?
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 21:05
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
KHB
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 105
Rep Power: 6
lava12005 is on a distinguished road
Hi, I am not sure about this, so just wondering.
If we consider the case whereby the airfoil is moving, the speed at the ground (yes boundary layer is there) is equal to the speed of the farfield which is basically 0.
Am I right to say that the ground boundary condition for simulation (where the airfoil is fixed) is a velocity inlet where the velocity specified is equal in both magnitude and direction at the normal inlet?

Moreover, some of the experiment in quantifying ground effect is based on the double body test. But some other perform it using a moving belt as the ground, so is the double body experiment is 'correct'? Since the velocity at the symetry plane is not necessarily equal to the movement speed of the airfoil.
lava12005 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 21:32
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Moreover, some of the experiment in quantifying ground effect is based on the double body test. But some other perform it using a moving belt as the ground, so is the double body experiment is 'correct'? Since the velocity at the symetry plane is not necessarily equal to the movement speed of the airfoil.
Depends. If the airfoil is a few chords from the surface and the upper surface normal is pointing away from the ground, then symmetry is probably OK.

On the other hand, if the airfoil is close to the ground and the upper surface normal vector is pointed towards the ground, i.e. the inverted race car airfoil and the flow over the "upper" surface is moving much faster than freestream, then it may be better to use a moving ground plane.

Edit: Oh, and it depends on Reynolds number. For the race car front wing, the lower the Reynolds number, the more likely the moving ground plane will be required.
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wing in ground effect meenakshi FLUENT 1 July 12, 2008 13:29
ground effect fluent modelling meenakshi FLUENT 0 June 11, 2008 01:09
Ground effect d bull CFX 1 April 12, 2007 08:39
Wing in Ground Effect mondal Main CFD Forum 2 June 28, 2006 06:12
Ground Effect & Turbolence Model Stefano CD-adapco 3 December 17, 2002 07:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:37.