|
[Sponsors] |
SimpleFoam / Laminar flow / Why k & w are still required? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 8, 2013, 06:27 |
SimpleFoam / Laminar flow / Why k & w are still required?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Canakkale Dardanelspor
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
== 1 == A steady-state & laminar (Re << 100) flow case is run with simpleFoam. (Considering icoFoam is suggested to be used for only transient laminar flows in the User Guide). The turbulence modelling is kOmegaSST. == 2 == I wonder why I need to set up k and w parameters in the numerical setting even though the flow is laminar? == 3 == RASProperties/transportProperties/turbulenceProperties k&Omega Settings Many thanks in advance for any help. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boundary Layer of Laminar Flow over a Flat Plate | Blasius_Pohlhausen_Crocco | Main CFD Forum | 12 | September 30, 2013 17:35 |
How to enforce laminar flow while using k-e | Grzegorz Kondora | FLUENT | 0 | January 28, 2009 10:35 |
Validation for laminar Disperse phase flow | shashwat | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 4, 2008 02:20 |
Divergence of Laminar Flow With Eddy ??? | Peter Kostka | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 9, 2002 17:02 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 12:19 |