|August 31, 2013, 10:36||
Turbulent frequency equation for compressible kOmegaSST turbulence model
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 13Rep Power: 5
I have one question that concerns turbulent frequency equation in compressible kOmegaSST equation (I mean "omega equation")...
There is the definition of SuSP term in Programmers Guide: SuSp(rho,phi) = rho*phi
In turbulent frequency equation:
rho_*(F1 - scalar(1))*CDkOmega/omega_,
which (by the programmers guide) means: (rho_*(F1 - scalar(1))*CDkOmega/omega_)*omega_
Why don't we simply write: rho_*(F1 - scalar(1))*CDkOmega ?
|September 6, 2013, 06:45||
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 323Rep Power: 10
I guess this is part of the numeric magic of OpenFOAM:
fvm::SuSp can be used to either add a source term explicitly or implicitly to an equation depending on the sign of the factor. This can improve the stability by increasing the diagonal dominance of the matrix.
See for example here: http://www.foamcfd.org/Nabla/guides/...x14-410002.4.9
|compressible komegasst, komegasst, omega, omega equation|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model||FelixL||OpenFOAM Bugs||27||March 27, 2012 09:02|
|error message||cuteapathy||CFX||14||March 20, 2012 07:45|
|Zero equation turbulence model gives better result??||Sanyo||CFX||10||June 26, 2011 10:58|
|Low Reynolds k-epsilon model||YJZ||ANSYS||1||August 20, 2010 13:57|
|Constant velocity of the material||Sas||CFX||15||July 13, 2010 08:56|