
[Sponsors] 
December 7, 2010, 00:45 

#41 
Member
Stefano Wahono
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 7 
Thank you, Maddalena.
I will try it out.
__________________
Stefano Wahono Defence Science and Technology Organisation Propulsion Systems 

December 7, 2010, 01:34 
Heat Source

#42 
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7 

December 7, 2010, 03:06 

#43 
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 13 
Hi Clark,
the original file is this one: OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM1.6.x/applications/solvers/heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam/derivedFvPatchFields/solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupled/solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupledFvPatchScalarField .C Hint: it is always a good idea to create a copy of the original solver to your own folder (OpenFOAM/userID1.6.x/applications/solvers) before modifying it! Mad 

January 17, 2011, 10:21 
Some results on steady and unsteady cht simulations on two solid regions

#44 
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 13 
Hello everybody,
After a while, I had the chance to work on cht again and, following some suggestions I had, I decided to investigate a little bit deeper the problem of adding an explicit heat source on conduction equation in chtMultiRegionFoam. Setup I created a two solids geometry, similar to what I did here but with region2 larger than before (see geom01.png). I planned 6 different simulations, applying different conditionA and conditionB BC and switching on or off a heat source on region1:
Results What I am more interested in is simulations V and VI, thus the following discussion applies to them. However, similar conclusions can be drawn for the others. Firstly, I analyzed the temperature variation with position and compared it with theory. Results are reported in xvst.png. As can be seen, results given by steady solver close match the theoretical distribution, while a small error (about 0.5°C) is obtained with the unsteady simulation. As a second step, I checked time vs temperature for simulation V on the selected point and compare it with the theoretically known temperature variation. As can be seen in figure timevst.png, both using a fixed time step or an adjustable time step, the simulated curves are far to be as in the theory. However, while the fixed time step simulation reaches (almost) the expected steady state temperature for the selected point, the adjustable time step simulation has an unrealistic discontinuity, which spoils the solution before the steady state. Some more tests showed that the position in time of this discontinuity was not affected by the time the solution was saved on the hard disk, but it seems affected by the maxDi value. Conclusions
To do This is for a two solids geometry. What happens when considering a fluid? My next step is to test the same geometry for a steady state & incompressible simulation, with a heat source, using a modified version of this solver. Notes is what I reported before these tests wrong? Well, not completely. What I did was to consider the simulation failed when, checking the solution, I could not see the steady state, but this study has showed that chtMultiRegionFoam is not able to simulate correctly the temperature variation in time. Therefore, my error was to consider a total simulation time related to the theoretically known time constant of the solids, while a longer simulated time would have been more appropriate. Please, can anybody comment on that? Any experience on the subject is welcome, of course! Regards, mad 

January 19, 2011, 19:00 

#45 
Senior Member
Mirko Vukovic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 159
Rep Power: 8 
Hi Maddalena,
can you please post archives of setups 5 & 6? I would like to study them some more. Thank you, Mirko 

January 20, 2011, 03:39 

#46 
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 8 
Hi mad,
I'm also still working on this problem and I think I made some progress. The problem is I have no data from theory to compare my results. Where do you get this theory data from? Or do you have any cases for me which I can use for comparison? Thanks in advance Toni 

January 25, 2011, 06:27 

#47 
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 13 
hi guys,
come back in my office today. I will post setup 5 and 6 in the next days, hope within this week. Please, be patient... mad 

January 31, 2011, 06:59 
Cases

#48 
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 13 
Hi,
@mirko here are the two cases you asked for. Note that both require a modified model of chtMultiRegionFoam which includes a heat source (variable H). They are ready to run, there is nothing to setup  couple  modify. Hope you find them useful. Please report anything! @toni I compared my results with theoretical values you get from formulas for a 1D geometry. Conduction equation, that is it! Enjoy, mad 

June 14, 2011, 01:57 

#49 
Member
fisch
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 8 
Hello maddalena,
did you finally use "H" in your TEqun or did you use something like Su(H) for introducing the Volumes? thanks a lot, rupert 

June 14, 2011, 10:28 

#50 
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 13 

June 30, 2011, 08:06 

#51 
Member
Nicolas
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Biarritz / France
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 6 
Hi Maddalena,
I'd like to study the cooling of a room in which there is a voltage transformer. The heat power is dissipated through a cooling system (seen as a porous medium), with 3 fans behind it. Thanks to your hint I succeeded in setting up the fans' BC. The question is : is your chtMultiRegionHeatSourceSimpleFoam suited for the job? If so, would you mind, please, send it at nicolas[dot]bur[at]laposte[dot]net? Regards 

July 12, 2011, 07:32 
Summary

#52 
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 13 
Just to be clear and for everybody is new here:
Unless what the name says, chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam is for compressible flow: http://foam.sourceforge.net/docs/cpp...674e2e921.html since it implements buoyancy. Let us say that the name SimpleFoam is not really appropriate... In order to have a steady state, incompressible and turbulent cht solver, one has to modify the solver made by Fabio here: chtIcoMultiRegionFoam  Incompressible version of chtMultiRegionFoam.. the following should be implemented:
If an unsteady, incompressible and turbulent solver is required, conjugateHeatFoam (1.6ext) should be changed. The following should be implemented:
This is only to trace back my progress (if any... ). Maybe someone else will find them useful. Maybe someone else can tell me if I am wrong. mad 

March 21, 2012, 06:20 

#53  
Senior Member
Andrea Pasquali
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 8 
Dear Maddalena,
I'm trying to use chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam (2.1.0) for a Heat Pipe application where I have:  two incompressible fluids (liquid water and steam) in two different regions  a solid region whit heat (fuel cell) I prepared a model with 3 regions (you can see the picture attached). I resolved "well" (I hope!) problems regarding two phase coupling, incompressiblility, capillarity effects, grid convergence... but what I did not solved yet is the heat flux in "red" patch! For the heat I used in my "red" BC: 1) temperature fixed value. The simulation reaches convergence but the heat flux I have through the solid region is not enough 2) heat flux fixed value (externalWallHeatFluxTemperature). The simulation doesn't reach convergence. The temperatures rises for ever! 3) fixed gradient. Equal to (2) 4) I tried to use your Vol. Heat Source. I added the field H and changed the solid eqn as: Quote:
I'm running now 2 simulation, 1 with zero gradient T and 1 with fixed value T in "red" BC and zero gradient H for both for all solid patches. I'll report my results here, Thanks for any help/suggestion Andrea
__________________
Andrea Pasquali 

March 21, 2012, 06:44 

#54  
Senior Member
maddalena
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 13 
Quote:
As for H: I used internalField uniform XXX; and zeroGradient on the boundary patches, including the interfaces between different regions. As for T: I used internalField uniform ambientTemperature; and zeroGradient or solidWallMixedTemperatureCoupled on the boundary patches, depending if the coupling was needed or not. Hope this help, mad 

March 22, 2012, 05:01 

#55 
Senior Member
Andrea Pasquali
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 8 
Hi,
here my (first) results with Vol. Heat Source in solid region and: 1) T fixedValue at "red" patch 2) T zeroGradient at "red" patch As you can see from pictures: 1) with fixedValue (T_fV.jpg) the temperatures seem to reach convergence but the T at interface steam/solid is grater than the free solid wall ! This is very strange for me because the heat is going out the domain (?)... 2) with zeroGradient (T_zG.jpg) the temperatures don't seem to reach convergence... or how many iterations I need to? Now it seems that using Vol. Heat Source in solid region instead heat flux in "red" patch does not solve the problem.... the T doesn't converge too. My question is: how is the correct way to set Heat Flux? (I have already tried fixedGradient, externalWallHeatFluxTemperature, vol. heat source...). It seems only T fixed value allow me to reach convergence, but T fixed value at "red" patch is not what I want! Maybe steady state is not good for this? Do I need transient? Any comment is useful! Thanks Andrea
__________________
Andrea Pasquali 

May 11, 2012, 04:39 

#56 
New Member
Adam Sitko
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 5 
Dear Foamers,
I'm playing with chtMultiRegionFoam, in my case I would like to have heat source too. I added: "H" to solveSolid.H, " volScalarField H ( IOobject ( "H" runTime.timeName(), mesh, IOobject::MUST_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE ), mesh );" to setRegionsSolidField.H and "PrtList<volScalarField> H(solidRegions.size());" to createSolidFields.H I can compile my solver but it returns error: Cannot find file file /.../cht/0.0588235/solid/H Where is the problem? It seems that the solver can't read 0/H file. 

September 17, 2012, 13:48 

#57 
New Member
Fabien Farella
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6 
Hi Maddalena,
I am working on the same implementation and I am facing the same problem. Did you make any progress on this issue? Fab 

April 20, 2014, 01:20 
Adding heat source to chtMultiregionFoam

#58  
Senior Member
Mohammad Shakil Ahmmed
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: AU
Posts: 124
Rep Power: 6 
Hi Maddalena,
Can you please advice me how added the volume heat source to the chtMultiregionFoam ? My problem is similar to yours (heat transfer between to different solids). Thanks in advance. shakil Quote:


July 16, 2014, 02:57 
chtMultiregionSimpleFoam

#59 
New Member
Anastasios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 8 
Dear All,
I am solving a multisolid domain consisting of three different solids one in the bottom, one in the middle and one in the top. I apply a fixed temp Gradient at the bottom patch of the bottom solid which is the heat flux (W/m2) divided by the thermal conductivity (k) of the bottom solid (W/mK). When i use the same k for all three solids the results are as expected. However when i use a different k for the middle solid the results are not correct. Can anybody help me Thanks T. 

Tags 
chtmultiregionfoam, coupling, heat source, interface 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Moving heat Source  AB  FLUENT  2  January 30, 2012 08:06 
Version 15 on Mac OS X  gschaider  OpenFOAM Installation  120  December 2, 2009 11:23 
moving heat source  Mehdi  FLUENT  0  March 24, 2008 18:32 
how to define volme heat source in udf ?  wanghong  FLUENT  0  February 24, 2006 04:53 
heat source in a domain  aydin  FLUENT  0  January 3, 2003 08:01 