CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Negativ Co-Number

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Tobi

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 5, 2014, 12:28
Default Negativ Co-Number
  #1
Super Moderator
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51
Tobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Hello all,

I am working on a coffee - cht - case. Therefor I am using three regions:

- air
- coffee (water)
- cup (solid/ceramic)

Meshing with sHM is not a problem but after initializing (constructors of the code) I will get a negative Co-Number of my water region.

To simulate water I first used the thermodynamicProperties of the chtMultiRegionFoam tutorial - liquid heater. Well I don't want have a constant density so I decided to use the polynomial function.


With the tutorial properties I get no a negative number
With the polynomial functions I get negative co - numbers


Therefor I think that my polynomial coefficients are wrong because Co is calculated with U, dt, dx and mu. The first three variables are the same only the mu value is calculated with the polynomial functions. I checked the functions with gnu plot and open office and there is everything okay.

Additionally I checked the sign of the coefficient values but there is no error too.

But it should be the reason, isn īt it?
I will try to use just one coefficient - the first one. This should be the same as constant values then, isnīt it?

Does someone know that problem?
I think I am on the right way and will you keep posted. But the strange thing is that gnu plot and open office is calculating everything correct.

The only thing that could be is that I get unphysical values for the temperature so that the polynomial function is not guilty anymore.

Regards
Tobi
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2014, 17:32
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tussenhausen
Posts: 2,708
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 51
Tobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura aboutTobi has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Hi all,

density polynomial was wrong. I missed a decade.

0.05 --> 0.005

Regards
Tobi
wyldckat likes this.
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. smnaryal CFX 11 December 20, 2017 16:32
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam gooya_kabir OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 2, 2013 13:58
Stable boundaries marcoymarc CFX 33 March 13, 2013 06:39
error in parallel run immortality OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 January 1, 2013 13:35
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 27, 2011 21:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38.