CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Incompressible LES mixing in a T junction

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 13, 2007, 11:20
Default Dear all, Running a transie
  #1
bramdejager
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear all,

Running a transient simulation of mixing in a T junction using the Oodles solver extended with a passive scalar, the velocity field shows checkerboard oscillations.

These oscillations occur in the two inlet ducts before the mixing zone. Downstream the mixing zone the velocity seems smooth (but of course turbulent).

I use the linear scheme for div(phi,U) and the other div schemes are set to limitedLinear. The mesh is built of hexahedrals, while the time step is such that Co_max = 1.4 or something. Co_mean is 0.2.

Regarding the extended oodles solver: I did not change any solution algoritm.

Anyone having a clue?

Many thanks,

Bram
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2007, 06:13
Default Hi, I have seen same kind of
  #2
Member
 
ville vuorinen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8
ville is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I have seen same kind of checkerboard oscillations
when running implicit LES (LES with no sgs model) of a free jet that enters a chamber i.e. when using the "linear" scheme. This was at a situation where Co_max = 0.10. My understanding is that if
the cell Reynolds number ( U*dx/nu ) is smaller than two, oscillations will most probably not
develop. Otherwise they will probably be seen.
I guess this
would need some kind of a further comment...
I don't know if the available discretization schemes are
actually a limitation of doing e.g. DNS with OF.
Best regards,
Ville
ville is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2007, 05:40
Default Hej, Regarding the cell rey
  #3
bramdejager
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hej,

Regarding the cell reynolds number as mentioned by Ville: this would force me to use a very fine mesh, I think. But it depends on your definition of nu (subgrid viscosity or the fluid viscosity).

Nevertheless, it seems that spatial discretization is the main source of 'checkerboard' oscillations in the case I described. The filteredLinear scheme does not show the oscillations while the linear scheme does.

I found out however that keeping Co_max < 1 helps the solver anyway to keep stable for both schemes, despite the checkboarding of the latter.

Does someone has a clue regarding the order of accuracy of the filteredLinear scheme? From the header-file in the source it seems that it should be 2nd order for 80% of the solution.


Regards,

Bram
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2007, 07:56
Default Hi, I don't know about the fi
  #4
Member
 
ville vuorinen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 8
ville is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I don't know about the filteredLinear scheme but it would be very interesting to give it a try.
If the cell Reynolds number is required to be < 2 then applying "the rumor that oscillations will probably not develop if Re_cell < 2" supports the
use of a sgs model i.e. doing LES with the linear
scheme.This should effectively decrease the cell
reynolds number by increasing the effective viscosity. Considering e.g. normal channel flow, for me it seems that some people get "good resuls" with
no oscillations etc using the linear scheme whereas other people might see these oscillations.
Is the difference between these results in using
a proper sgs model (no oscillations?) vs
e.g. dns (oscillations?). Would anybody be interested commenting?

Regards,
Ville
ville is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
junction box routine - more than one? Ollimarc CFX 1 March 18, 2008 03:32
Junction Box Anil CFX 2 June 27, 2006 10:18
PIPE JUNCTION kamesh Main CFD Forum 1 June 5, 2005 16:59
Mixing of two incompressible liquids Pei-Ying Hsieh (Hsieh) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 23, 2005 10:14
ideal gas mixing law and mass-weighted mixing law Shankar FLUENT 0 June 24, 2003 13:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:41.