CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Arbitrary Cyclic beta code

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 13, 2007, 10:10
Default Hi all, my question concer
  #1
Member
 
Luca M.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luzern, Switzerland
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 8
luca is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
my question concerns the implementation of non conformal cyclic boundaries (called later on as arbitrary cyclic).

The idea is to calculate the geometric parameters (such as reconstructed faceCellCenters, weights and deltas) and boundary values for each field, interpolating (patchToPatchInterpolation::faceInterpolate() ) values from the twin patch (the other coupled patch).

I tried to implement such boundaries merging together Hvroje's ggiInterface and cyclic patch but what I obtain is this:

if I apply arbitrary cyclic condition on conformal cyclic patch results are almost identical to standard cyclic,

if arbitrary cyclic patches are applied on non conformal boundaries after some iteration the linear system solver diverge (usually solving the energy equation, if this may help) even if the convergence history is good and no wrong field are observed before the crash.

I thought this could be caused by the small number of nodes taken by the patchToPatchInterpolation to calculate the interpolation weights (the hit face and its neighbors) but also enlarging the set of nodes to the face hit by the vertices and their neighbor faces, the result is the same: divergence is only postponed.
If someone want to have a look, I posted the source codes and related test case meshes (conformal and non-conformal)
I used on this link:

http://htc.de.unifi.it/docpub/conf.tgz

http://htc.de.unifi.it/docpub/non-conf.tgz

http://htc.de.unifi.it/docpub/ggiCyclicTools.tgz

I have seen that there is still work going on about this subject, (Maryse Page and Håkan Nilsson: can it be a good starting point?!), since I cannot go further, I would like to hear your thoughts and comments on that. I would appreciate so much your help.

Thanks in any case.

Luca e Cosimo
luca is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
beta level ? donminoti CFX 1 February 3, 2009 17:15
Paraview 3 Beta gschaider OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam 2 May 30, 2007 18:30
Arbitrary cyclic patch luca OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 December 21, 2006 18:50
doubt about beta PDF CH Main CFD Forum 7 June 10, 2005 10:20
Cyclic Boundaries -> Match Option -> Arbitrary Derek CD-adapco 1 August 4, 2004 22:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38.