|December 19, 2011, 10:49||
MRFSimpleFoam and turbulence models
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4Rep Power: 8
Can anybody explain why did high-Re turbulence models are used in all MRFsimplefoam cases( and even in cases that used GGI) tutorial? If I understand everything clearly than high-Re models used near-wall functions. In there turn, wall functions constructed on idea about exact type of the velocity profile and velocity value below 0 on the surface. If we talk about moving/rotating wall than there is some velocity on it surface and so we can't use near-wall functions, can we?
Please, explain what did I miss in my talk?
|April 30, 2015, 05:40||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 121Rep Power: 9
Some doubt here. I am using OF2.3.x to simulate a wind turbine and strange results are obtained with activating turbulence. k and epsilon over the surface is not real.
|ggi, mrfsimplefoam, near wall functions, turbulence model|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|MRFSimpleFoam amp Salome Meca||tommie||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||5||November 5, 2014 03:54|
|Convergence with MRFSimpleFoam||grugg||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||7||March 28, 2014 05:56|
|MRFSimpleFoam Tutorial||bastil||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||48||August 1, 2012 10:00|
|MRFSimpleFOAM goes divergenced!||renyun0511||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||0||November 19, 2009 03:11|
|How can run MRFSimpleFoam with KOmegaSST turbulence model||waynezw0618||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||0||April 21, 2008 04:40|