|January 9, 2014, 17:19||
icoFoam - backward facing step measured by Armaly et. al. (1983)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5Rep Power: 6
I am trying to validate icoFoam for the backward facing step results of Armaly et. al.
I have a Reynolds number of 1200 and the expected ratio of recirculation length to step size is 18 whereas I get a value of 5 at steady state.
Could this be a problem with using icoFoam?
I am attaching the openFoam folder structure for the problem setup.
|January 23, 2014, 23:47||
Santiago Marquez Damian
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Santa Fe, Santa Fe, Argentina
Posts: 418Rep Power: 14
Santiago MÁRQUEZ DAMIÁN, Ph.D.
Research Center for Computational Mechanics (CIMEC) - CONICET/FICH-UNL
T.E.: 54-342-4511594 Ext. 1005
Güemes 3450 - (3000) Santa Fe
Santa Fe - Argentina
|armaly, backward facing step, benchmark, bfs, icofoam|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|backward facing step simple with no particle||saeed115||Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing||0||March 5, 2013 18:41|
|IcoFoam parallel woes||msrinath80||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||9||July 22, 2007 02:58|
|Could anybody help me see this error and give help||liugx212||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||3||January 4, 2006 19:07|
|Backward Facing Step||Pete||Main CFD Forum||5||June 28, 2000 21:40|
|backward facing step problem||Yung-Ming Chen||Main CFD Forum||3||May 11, 1999 22:04|