|
[Sponsors] |
URANS in OF - Which is the more appropiate solver? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 11, 2016, 06:05 |
URANS in OF - Which is the more appropiate solver?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi to everyone, I write you to ask if an unsteady simulation is feasible in OF, or if there can be some problems.
In order to simulate the design of a tiltrotor a mesh of about 150 Million cells is required for a URANS-based approach (k-w SST Menter), with time steps of the order of 10-5s (10 to 15 substeps per time step, implicit approach), for a total simulated physical time close to 0.05s. The flow conditions are M=0.23, Reynolds number per meter : 2.7 Moi. Is OF capable to manage unsteady simulations with this high frequency? In this case, which could be the mode approprite solver to use? Thanks, WhiteW |
|
November 23, 2017, 07:49 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
Yes. PimpleFoam.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fluent Adjoint Solver? | ex10148 | FLUENT | 16 | September 28, 2018 08:11 |
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error | Peter_600 | OpenFOAM | 4 | August 2, 2014 09:52 |
Divergence problem | Smaras | FLUENT | 13 | February 21, 2013 05:03 |
3d vof | Smaras | FLUENT | 2 | February 19, 2013 06:58 |
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? | bearcat | CFX | 6 | April 28, 2008 14:08 |