|
[Sponsors] |
June 29, 2015, 20:38 |
too dense mesh deteriorates the simulation
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 134
Rep Power: 13 |
hi,
I'm using pimpleFoam to simulate the flow around a circular cylinder. I found that many times that if a dense mesh is used for a low Reynolds number simulation, say Re=100, the simulation is not physically correct(in terms of the drag or lift force coefficients). However, if I maintain the same mesh and raise the reynolds number to like 1000, the simulation seems to go well. does someone else also have the same experience with me? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
airfoil mesh genaration and simulation with a trip on surface issue | rajibroy | Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing | 1 | December 3, 2014 02:04 |
[ANSYS Meshing] 3d wind turbine mesh for multiphase simulation | mingersai | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | January 17, 2012 18:20 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 11:55 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |
How to control Minximum mesh space? | hung | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2005 09:38 |