[ivan_cozza]

Hi Bernhard, and thank you for your answer.

Originally Posted by gschaider

I trust you had a look at the Wiki-page T.D. gave.

Yes, I take a look there sometimes ago.

Originally Posted by gschaider

So at least you stumbled upon normal() for the normal vecotor. U.snGrad() should give you the surface normal of U, but that is not what you want.

Correct, I don't need U.snGrad(), or at least not only it.

Originally Posted by gschaider

Another problem is your tau. For a patch as it is 2D you'll always have 2 orthogonal tangential directions so you'll probably want to reformulate (x dot tau) as mag(x-normal()*(normal() dot x)).

Again correct, in my case tau is the tangential vector aligned with the flow velocity U, so (U dot tau) = mag(U-normal()*(normal() dot U)).

Originally Posted by gschaider

Did I understand your formulation correctly that if you can calculate U_slip correctly from the current flow conditions, then you can set it on the boundary as a Dirichlet? Otherwise you'll have to reformulate it. But as I said: you'll have to play around (not sur how to implement the d/dTau in you equation) and I can't guarantee success

What I want to do is set the slip velocity at wall, so at the end a Dirichlet b.c. for U is possible. On the other end, for stability reasons I need to evaluate U_slip in an implicit way, so I can't just discretize the derivatives and solve.
For d(U dot n)/dtau, maybe it could be rewritten as grad(U dot n) dot tau

Any other ideas? I definitely hope that groovyBc would do the trick...
Thanks, Ivan

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by ivan_cozza

Again correct, in my case tau is the tangential vector aligned with the flow velocity U, so (U dot tau) = mag(U-normal()*(normal() dot U)).



What I want to do is set the slip velocity at wall, so at the end a Dirichlet b.c. for U is possible. On the other end, for stability reasons I need to evaluate U_slip in an implicit way, so I can't just discretize the derivatives and solve.
For d(U dot n)/dtau, maybe it could be rewritten as grad(U dot n) dot tau

Any other ideas? I definitely hope that groovyBc would do the trick...
Thanks, Ivan

I'm afraid implicit won't work (unless you can reduce it to a mixed-BC).

Bernhard

[ivan_cozza]

Originally Posted by gschaider

I'm afraid implicit won't work (unless you can reduce it to a mixed-BC).

Bernhard

What do you mean with reduce to a mixed b.c.?
My b.c. is essentially a mixed b.c., as apart from the constants it is in the form

a*f_wall + b*grad(f_wall) = c

what kind of modification it needs to be putted in a mixed b.c.?

Thanks,
Ivan

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by ivan_cozza

What do you mean with reduce to a mixed b.c.?
My b.c. is essentially a mixed b.c., as apart from the constants it is in the form

a*f_wall + b*grad(f_wall) = c

what kind of modification it needs to be putted in a mixed b.c.?

Thanks,
Ivan

With mixed b.c. I mean the mixed boundary condition as described in the UserGuide 5.2.3