|
[Sponsors] |
OpenFOAM, Courant number and implicit methods |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 19, 2011, 20:30 |
OpenFOAM, Courant number and implicit methods
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 18 |
I am carrying out some simulations of vortex shedding and vortex induced vibration for the case of a 3D circular cylinder at Re=10000 using Smagorinsky LES and the pimpleDyMFoam solver.
I have noticed that, although I am using the 2nd order backward implicit method for the temporal discretization, I must use adaptative time stepping with Courant number below 1.0 to get successful simulations. I would expect this behaviour with explicit methods. If Co is greater than 1.0, simulations stop due to large errors. The problem is not related to the convective discretization , because it happens even if I use limited methods like SuperBee. Even for laminar 2D simulations with Re=200 and the implicit 1st order Euler method I was unable to use large time-steps. Could someone explain why implicit methods do not allow larger time-steps when running transient vortex induced vibration simulations with OpenFOAM? Thanks, Fabio |
|
Tags |
courant number limit, implicit method, transient simulation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Courant number | fireman | FLUENT | 7 | September 11, 2021 11:33 |
ddt explicit or implicit with courant number!! | mrshb4 | OpenFOAM | 0 | December 13, 2010 11:13 |
Implicit ddt and Courant Number | Aleksey_R | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | February 12, 2010 03:41 |
Courant number and implicit treatment | pbo | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | January 19, 2008 15:29 |
Any questions about implicit Runge-Kutta methods? | Runge_Kutta | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 4, 2005 17:36 |