|
[Sponsors] |
February 11, 2016, 12:24 |
Initial conditions
|
#1 |
Member
André Luiz Moura Silva Moreira
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello,
I am working with external flow. So, on "Continua>Physics>initial conditions>velocity" I set the velocity [0 , 7 , 0] m/s. And, on "Region>Windtunnel>Boundary>Inlet>Physics Values" I set [0 , 7 , 0]. My question, I don't know if this is correct. I need set both with 7m/s or just one? |
|
February 11, 2016, 14:43 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 10 |
The setting in the initial conditions of the physics continuum is the starting solution of the whole domain. This means that every single cell in the regions that have the physics continnum applied will have that velocity value. As soon as the solver start to run, it will replace the values in the interior cells by the one calculated out of the boundary conditions. The better the initial solution is, the better and fast the solver will converge. So if you don't set the velocity [0 , 7 , 0] m/s there, it can be of advantage but also of disadvantage depending on the expected flow field. If the solution is fully converged, the starting solution shouldn't matter in general anymore.
On the other side you have the boundary conditions. This is the place where you think you know the solution already. So the setting there is absolutely nevessary. These are the faces that will keep their solution as the solver doesn't calculate them. Instead the solver uses them to calculate the solution in the interior field. |
|
February 11, 2016, 21:21 |
|
#3 |
Member
André Luiz Moura Silva Moreira
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Thank you a lot. I changed to [0 0 0] and the results looks better.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with chtMultiregionFoam radiation boundary condition | baran_foam | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | December 17, 2019 17:36 |
High Courant Number @ icoFoam | Artex85 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | February 16, 2017 13:40 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 03:34 |
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence | jonmec | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 28, 2011 05:24 |
Unknown error | sivakumar | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 9 | September 9, 2008 12:53 |