|
[Sponsors] |
January 26, 2012, 06:05 |
Tecplot shock detection
|
#1 |
New Member
Andrea Ferrero
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi everyone,
I'm looking for an algorithm to detect a shock during post processing. I found a tool in Tecplot 360 which does this work quite well: does anyone know which algorithm is employed in Tecplot? Thank you very much Andrea Ferrero |
|
January 26, 2012, 19:31 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Scott Rumage
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 152
Rep Power: 16 |
Andrea,
On page 384 the Tecplot 360 user manual states ( http://download.tecplot.com/360/current/tpum.pdf ) : Tecplot 360 can display important features in 3D fluid flow solutions that make analyzing the solutions much easier. For trans-sonic flow, it can display shock surfaces. For all flows, including incompressible flows, it can display lines indicating the location of vortex cores, as well as separation and attachment lines. These calculations make use of MIT’s FX library. For more information on this library, please see http://raphael.mit.edu/fx/. These features are accessed through the Extract Flow Features dialog. This paragraph and reference may be an answer to your question. Scott |
|
January 27, 2012, 03:43 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Andrea Ferrero
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you very much, Scott.
I find the article "Shock Detection From Computational Fluid Dynamics Results" cited in your link very useful, in particular the algorithm for moving shocks. Andrea |
|
November 7, 2012, 08:54 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Huazhao
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Has anyone any idea that why the value of "shock" variable in Tecplot can be greater than 1 or less than -1? I tried to capture a shock interface in a 2D convergent-divergent nozzle. Although the position is deriable, but the lengend given in Tecplot has a value which can be as high as 30 and as low as -30. According to the definition,
it should be (U/a) dot (grad(P))/|grad(P)|, how could it be larger than 1? I have read the reference listed above, it says for stationary shock the the location is the place where the value of Ma vector dot pressure gradient should be one. Can anybody tell me what's going on there? Thank you in advance. Last edited by anqingxu; November 7, 2012 at 08:55. Reason: not very clear for my question |
|
September 1, 2013, 09:21 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Xu Yizhe
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
||
September 1, 2013, 09:25 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Xu Yizhe
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
The following link http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/artic...00936113001143 is our paper related to shock detection and post-processing, which would be in your interest.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
shock detection | smkhan | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 14, 2010 13:57 |
shock detection in the Riemann problems(specially in the stationary contact problems) | smkhan | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 10, 2010 08:25 |
shock detection in the Riemann problems(specially in the stationary contact problems) | smkhan | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 10, 2010 08:24 |
Shock Fitting | Craig | FLUENT | 1 | April 24, 2008 17:06 |
Will compression waves overtake a moving shock? | GRA | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 19, 2006 00:24 |