|
[Sponsors] |
Grid refinement study for Order of accuracy and GCI |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 25, 2011, 15:04 |
Grid refinement study for Order of accuracy and GCI
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Zurich
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 15 |
I am trying to ascertain the numerical accuracy of my simulations in CFX by following the procedure mentioned in the editorial policy of Journal of engineering.
My simulations are 3D turbulent flow . I take the overall pressure drop from inlet to outlet as the solution variable to calculate GCI and I use a representative mesh size for each mesh which I calculate as (total volume/total number of cells)^(1/3). I have generated results for many meshes and tried to calculate GCI for 3 meshes at any time. I have ensured that the grid refinement ratios r21 and r32 are both above 1.3 for any of the mesh set that i consider. However, I find that for the different mesh sets that i consider: a)either the the parameter GCI_fine*(r21^p)/GCI_course is not close to one. This parameter should be close to one for the grids to be in asymptotic range. b)when this parameter is indeed close to one for a set of meshes, (and GCI_fine is also is small..less than 2 percent), the observed order of accuracy p that I calculate comes out to be around 4 . Now I think it is incorrect and should be less than 2 (as the formal order of accuracy of CFX is 2...please correct me if I am wring). I have tried many fine and coarse meshes. Is the way I am calculating GCI correct? Is the value of p>2 indeed correct? For the results to be considered accurate what is the maximum acceptable value of GCI? Last edited by Chander; April 25, 2011 at 17:43. |
|
Tags |
gci, grid refinement |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GCI non-uniform grid | Mat | FLUENT | 0 | June 14, 2004 14:21 |