# under relaxation factor

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 21, 2012, 09:59 under relaxation factor #1 New Member   Ehsan Akrami Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Iran Posts: 7 Rep Power: 6 hi guys , a question can we change under relaxation factors while fluent is solving ? the Convergence is right ?

 August 22, 2012, 07:41 #2 Member   misagh Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 63 Rep Power: 6 hi during iteration it is not possible.but you can cancel iteration and adjust the urf and then iterate again. this method is mostly used when the residuals do not change severly after so many iterations say 500-600 iterations,here the problem is converged although it has not reached the specified residuals. ehsanakrami likes this.

 August 22, 2012, 12:07 #3 New Member   Ehsan Akrami Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Iran Posts: 7 Rep Power: 6 yes , i mean cancel it and change factors . but when we decrease th factors sudenlly the residuals get down . is the reasult correct in this way ?

 August 22, 2012, 14:01 #4 Super Moderator     Ghazlani M. Ali Join Date: May 2011 Location: Tokyo, Japan Posts: 1,366 Blog Entries: 23 Rep Power: 21 when you see that residual are not stable, it is better to lower the urf. Start by a very low urf, then while iterate as it gets better , give them higher value. ehsanakrami likes this. __________________ Regards, New to ICEM CFD, try this document --> https://goo.gl/NEbygB Ali

 August 22, 2012, 16:04 #5 Member   misagh Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 63 Rep Power: 6 dear friends i don't think lowering the urf be a good way of solving the problem.THE BEST THING IS DEFAULT VALUES.if it has oscillation change it or when the residuals does not decrease and is taking a straight line you can lower it down.BUT USE THE MAXIMUM VALUE FOR URF IF IT IS POSSIBLE. note that the results(after convergence) are dependent to the urf .but if changes are less than 5-10 % don't care about it.you had better check your numerical values with an experimental or theoretical one. finally i found the link below really useful: www.bakker.org/dartmouth06/engs150/05-solv.ppt best regards. ehsanakrami likes this.

 August 23, 2012, 03:54 #6 New Member   Ehsan Akrami Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Iran Posts: 7 Rep Power: 6 my residuals are shown in blow . i decrease URF step by step . the places that it suddenly get down , the URF decreases . for example each step i decrease it 0.01 . my result it correct ?

 August 23, 2012, 05:07 #7 Member   misagh Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 63 Rep Power: 6 dear ehsan, it's really hard to evaluate the accuracy of your problem without being aware of the details of it.the best thing is to check your results(e.g. the Nuselt Number for constant heat flux is 4.63 OR in a pipe the velocity of centerline must be 2 times of mean velocity OR for laminar flow in a tube in fully developed region f=64/Re ...) but your residuals have oscillation and my sixth sense(!) threw me into doubt about the accuracy of your solution.i don't know maybe the number of mesh cells are not enough(evaluate your mesh independence) any way the best thing is to check your results. regards ehsanakrami likes this.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post dhxlxz CFX 10 August 11, 2015 20:52 jing113cn FLUENT 0 November 2, 2009 13:13 Benzaa Main CFD Forum 1 August 18, 2009 07:27 CFD Rookie Main CFD Forum 3 January 26, 2004 15:37 Moon CD-adapco 1 June 13, 2003 11:13

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16.