|January 29, 2013, 03:50||
Pressure far field vs Velocity inlet/Pressure Outlet
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 15Rep Power: 4
I just wanna ask you what's the difference btw 'Pressure Far Field' and 'Velocity Inlet and Pressure Outlet' when setting up the model of 2D airfoil (here, tried NACA 0012).
I tried both of them and found the following trends.
For the Pressure Far Field set,
Cd and Cl have a periodic trend on their graph and it repeated.
For the other case,
Even though the result of the two dimensionless factors showed a good convergence, the converged values were too far from the experimental ones.
So, I am wondering what I should look at when setting up the model for the boundary conditions.
|January 29, 2013, 11:45||
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 77Rep Power: 6
It is pretty straightforward, you can easily find some things about that on the Fluent Theory Guide. Anyway the thing is that VelocityInlet/PressureOutlet are only used for incompressible cases only (velocity under Mach 0.3)
If you are compressible (this is usually set up by setting your material density to Ideal Gas and Viscosity to Sutherland) you shall use Pressure Far Field. You can use your entire boundary (i.e inlet, outlet and sides) and set it up as one single boundary in your meshing software, that saves time while setting up in Fluent.
So velocity inlet for incompressible, and pressure FF for compressible.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|simple model, difficult outlet||Eric||CFX||7||May 23, 2014 08:13|
|How to get the velocity field from the pressure field||Hermano||Main CFD Forum||2||November 29, 2011 09:32|
|Physical meaning of pressure in pressure eqn||dontknow||Main CFD Forum||2||August 30, 2010 10:12|
|Help ASAP! pressure inlet & outlet||engahmed||FLUENT||0||June 13, 2010 15:33|
|Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History||Abhi||Main CFD Forum||12||July 8, 2002 09:11|