|
[Sponsors] |
March 27, 2013, 17:37 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 151
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
I don't understand your statement about accuracy. Advecting a volume fraction more than one cell per time-step makes no sense and the solution you obtain will not be time accurate. Most free surface flows are not steady. I also believe that you will suffer from diffusion of the interphase if you use an implicit scheme for the VOF equation. So, yes the solution is most likely better with the explicit scheme.
__________________
"Trying is the first step to failure." - Homer Simpson |
||
Tags |
compressive, explicit, fluent, implicit, vof |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
boundary conditions in FLUENT VOF for open channel flow | newcomer | Fluent Multiphase | 32 | May 4, 2020 07:28 |
VOF implicit or explicit | hamid1 | FLUENT | 4 | June 25, 2012 04:51 |
about VOF. Fluent or CFD ACE? | Jiyeon | FLUENT | 5 | January 17, 2012 04:37 |
Implicit or explicit ? | Rickard.Solsjo | OpenFOAM | 0 | May 31, 2011 04:02 |
Does Fluent Calculate VOF before Momentum ? | Ganapathy | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | April 7, 2010 10:56 |