|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
I am reading the fluent help manual since one day and I don't manage to find a precise answer on the resolution of the boundary layer for FLUENT.
I am using Enhanced wall treatment : - for KE , I understood, if the mesh is suffisently small (Y+=1) then the 2 layers model will be used. If the mesh is coarse a wall function using : Kader [168] + White and Cristoph [418] and Huang et al. [147] will be used. Is it ok ? - But for kw-SST it become really really unclear : (chapter 4.4.4. Wall Boundary Conditions for Kw-SST) "This means that all boundary conditions for wall-function meshes will correspond to the wall function approach, while for the fine meshes, the appropriate low-Reynolds-number boundary conditions will be applied" (this is all right ;-)) and after :Analytical solutions can be given for both the laminar sublayer (eq : 4–118) and the logarithmic region (4–119). Therefore, a wall treatment can be defined for the w equation, which switches automatically from the viscous sublayer formulation to the wall function, depending on the grid. This blending ..." Are these equation used for a modeling the boundary layer or are they wall functions ? I am quite deasapointed because in Chapter :4.13.5.( Enhanced Wall Treatment ω-Equation (EWT-ω)) it is stated : "the Kw-equation can be integrated through the viscous sublayer without the need for a two-layer approach. This feature can be utilized for a y* -insensitive wall treatment by blending the viscous sublayer formulation and the logarithmic layer formulation based on y*,This formulation is the default for all Kw equation based models." And finaly in 4.13.4. (Enhanced Wall Treatment ε-Equation (EWT-ε)) "Please note that an alternative blending compared to the Kader-blending is used for the improved near wall treatment for turbulence models based on the w equation, which is the new default near wall treatment." I do not understand what is the wall function and what are the equations used for modeling (or blending ...) the complete BL ? If somebody get the point ... Thanks in Advance JB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
No idea ???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Raashid Baig
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Dear cfd_newbie,
To be simple, my question is just about how Fluent is dealing with wall treatment of Kw-SST models. When Fluent is using a wall function (if the mesh is not fine enought) what are the equations ? When FLUENT is using a wall treatment (by modelling), does it solve the NS equations until the wall or is it using a blending function ? Thanks in advance JB |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| boundary layer, enhanced wall traitment |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SLTS+rhoPisoFoam: what is rDeltaT??? | nileshjrane | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | February 25, 2013 04:13 |
| Velocity blows up suddenly after 30,000+ iterations | lordvon | OpenFOAM | 14 | October 27, 2010 11:13 |
| Boundary layer generation problems | ivan_cozza | OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others | 0 | October 6, 2010 13:47 |
| Error while running rhoPisoFoam.. | nileshjrane | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 26, 2010 12:50 |
| Unknown error | sivakumar | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 9 | September 9, 2008 12:53 |