CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

tetra hexa mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By BigBen

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 1, 2012, 08:40
Default tetra hexa mesh
  #1
Senior Member
 
hamid
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 6
hamid1 is on a distinguished road
Hi Guys,

i have to model a pipe in 3-d but with tetra mesh it seems that i have to dense it very very much to make the solution independent of grid,
do u think in hexa mesh it radically improves?

for grid independent study what is the role of thumb for the criteria to use, in terms of which parameter is better to be measured , how do u measure it (e.g. weighted average etc) and how much difference between denser and coarser mesh is acceptable?

thank you
hamid
hamid1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 1, 2012, 11:22
Default
  #2
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,965
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 39
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamid1 View Post
Hi Guys,

i have to model a pipe in 3-d but with tetra mesh it seems that i have to dense it very very much to make the solution independent of grid,
do u think in hexa mesh it radically improves?

for grid independent study what is the role of thumb for the criteria to use, in terms of which parameter is better to be measured , how do u measure it (e.g. weighted average etc) and how much difference between denser and coarser mesh is acceptable?

thank you
hamid
It is better to use hexa mesh. You can get the mesh independence at relatively low density in hexa.
Far is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2012, 20:05
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
BigBen is on a distinguished road
The idea when you are using hexa compare to tetra is to align your cells with the flow pattern. In this case, there is less information diffusion between the cells.

Now, in Fluid mechanics, everybody knows that the main pressure gradient is in the boundary layer, close to the wall.
Hexa mesh allows you to refine in the boundary layer thickness and to strech the mesh in the flow direction. Hexa mesh is anisotropic.

At the inverse, tetra mesh is an iotropic mesh. Means, if you want to refine in the boundary layer then you need to refine in the 3D dimensions (lot of cells).

2 "good" points: Hexa needs less cells and get less diffusion if flow aligned with the cells
1 bad point: it is not always easy to create an hexa mesh.

Tetra with never be as good as hexa
BigBen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2012, 11:49
Default Mesh Independent solution
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 5
Kamu is on a distinguished road
I am using hexa mesh for pipe flow but for all my element numbers the solution is grid independent. Am modelling turbulent flow with standard wall functions. When I change the distance from the wall using inflation layers the solution remains the same as previous one! The results seem sensible.
Kamu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2012, 12:13
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
BigBen is on a distinguished road
Fine,
If you obtain the same result whatever is the mesh, then it is perfect. Find the coaser mesh you can to reduce time consumption in the futur.
Which CFD code are you using?
Depending on the turbulence you are using, all the mesh are not recommanded.

The mesh size is based on the Y+.
You can decomposed the boundary layer in 3 layers:
Viscous sublayer
Outlayer and in the middle the log layer

Basically
Y+=1: sublayer linear layer u+=y+
30<Y+<300:log layer

You have to know where are valid your turbulence model and the wall function you are using.
Kamu likes this.
BigBen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2012, 11:23
Default
  #6
Member
 
banty
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 5
banty is on a distinguished road
Hi,

For the same number of cells in hexahedral and tetrahedral mesh, average cell centroid distance in tetrahedral mesh is larger compared to the hexaherdal mesh. thats why tetrahedral mesh need more no of cells to be grid independence.

Anyway hexahedral mesh gives more accurate result compared to tetrahedral mesh it does not matter which solver u are using because pure orthogonal quality of tetrahedral mesh.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hamid1 View Post
Hi Guys,

i have to model a pipe in 3-d but with tetra mesh it seems that i have to dense it very very much to make the solution independent of grid,
do u think in hexa mesh it radically improves?

for grid independent study what is the role of thumb for the criteria to use, in terms of which parameter is better to be measured , how do u measure it (e.g. weighted average etc) and how much difference between denser and coarser mesh is acceptable?

thank you
hamid
banty is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors DarrenC ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 August 5, 2013 06:42
[ICEM] Hexa Mesh Smoothing Jules ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 December 4, 2010 19:00
How to control Minximum mesh space? hung FLUENT 7 April 18, 2005 09:38
HELP! TETRA and HEXA boundary sunlight007 CD-adapco 6 August 6, 2004 06:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51.