|
[Sponsors] |
Reliability of current the Reynolds number correction method for scaling |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 14, 2014, 10:24 |
Reliability of current the Reynolds number correction method for scaling
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Meimei Wang
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 494
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
I heard about that, for aircraft design, people usually scale the experimental model to a smaller size in the wind tunnel. Then they keep the mach number the same and do the measurement. Then they use the Re correction formula to correct the measurement data to the original size. I'm wondering how reliable the Re correction calculation is? How many percentages of error will it introduce? And how about I use this method to the CFD scaling to reduce the grids number?
__________________
Best regards, Meimei |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Current density visualisation (PEM fuel cell add-on module) | pchoopanya | FLUENT | 10 | August 21, 2023 14:33 |
decomposePar pointfield | flying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | December 30, 2013 15:05 |
AMI interDyMFoam for mixer | danny123 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | June 19, 2013 04:49 |
CFX Solver Reynolds Number | haider760 | CFX | 2 | March 4, 2012 22:05 |
Unaligned accesses on IA64 | andre | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 23, 2008 10:37 |