
[Sponsors] 
August 15, 2014, 07:26 
finite volume discretization

#1 
New Member
ali
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 4 
how we can discretized kepsilon equation with finite volume method
thanks in advance 

August 15, 2014, 07:43 

#2 
Senior Member
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 199
Rep Power: 10 
it is normally similar to descritizing the energy equation


August 15, 2014, 08:14 

#3 
New Member
ali
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 4 
thanks
are we need to linearize ( epsilon^2) term in epsilon equation? 

August 15, 2014, 15:43 

#4 
Senior Member
Joachim
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 140
Rep Power: 7 
Hey,
You do not need to linearize anything when computing the fluxes, source terms, etc. You should only need the linearized fluxes if you are using an implicit scheme (when computing the Jacobian matrices). If you are unfamiliar with finite volume methods, I suggest you have a look at the following book: Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications by Blazek Really nice book, in which the finite volume version of the kepsilon model is described. Good luck, Joachim 

August 15, 2014, 16:50 

#5 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,692
Rep Power: 33 
The general guideline is that the differential equation must be written in divergence form so, that once integrated over a finite volume, you can express the surface integral of the normal component of the fluxes.
Such equation can be discretized using some quadrature rule for the integral and some numerical reconstrction for the fluxes 

August 16, 2014, 14:26 

#6  
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
epsilon^2 will be considered as sourceterm in the right hand side of your matrix system (if you use an implicit temporal scheme). 

August 20, 2014, 08:54 

#7 
New Member
ali
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 4 
what is the discretization of (du/dx)^2 term in finite volume method
thanks for your reply 

August 20, 2014, 11:18 

#8  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,692
Rep Power: 33 
Quote:
it cannot be written in divergence form but must be integrated over a finite volume as a source term. Then you can use some quadrature rule for the discretization of the integral (see the book of Peric & Ferziger) 

August 25, 2014, 08:39 

#10  
New Member
ali
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
what a about the [(du/dx)+(dv/dy)]^2 term? Last edited by sciense; August 25, 2014 at 12:10. 

August 25, 2014, 12:02 

#11 
Senior Member

Actually, the previous example only applies to terms like:
du_j/dx_i * du_k/dx_i = d/dx_i(u_j*du_k/dx_i)  u_j*d2u_k/dx_i^2 If you can fit your term in this template then it still applies. 

August 26, 2014, 05:04 

#12 
New Member
Parth Thaker
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Surat , Gujarat , INDIA
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 4 
how to descretise orlanski's boundary condition (CBC) using FVM???
thnx in advance 

Tags 
finite volume method, kepsilon model 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
ke turbulace model finite volume discretization  sciense  Main CFD Forum  1  June 13, 2014 08:29 
influence of convex or concave control volume in finite volume discretization  openfoammaofnepo  Main CFD Forum  1  March 24, 2014 03:13 
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF????  sharonyue  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  14  August 26, 2013 07:47 
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file  SSL  FLUENT  2  January 26, 2008 12:55 
finite volume VS finite element  solomon  Main CFD Forum  0  March 19, 2002 20:04 