CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

question for specific dissipation rate

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 20, 2010, 17:13
Default question for specific dissipation rate
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 8
kippo is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

a basic question: What is the mathematical correct definition of omega (specific dissipation rate in the k-omega)?

I cannot find a correct answer, anywhere. Also in Wilcox's book it is not mathematically described. Even in all books and publications I got, it is only derived by the turbulent viscosity definition.

Is it according to the Baldwin-Lomax as div x c ?

Hope, someone has a clue...


kippo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 21, 2010, 04:16
Senior Member
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 175
Rep Power: 9
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
Dear Kippo;
omega has a different meaning in k-omega turbulence models. it can be stated as:


in which epsilon is eddy dissipation, K is turbulence kinetic energy and C is the model constant. although in some versions of k-omega C is defined as a function of mean flow strain and rotation rates and omega itself implicitly.

Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2010, 05:08
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 8
kippo is on a distinguished road
Thnx a lot,

but this is again all the time the same definition I get.
What I mean is the following: To derive the equation for k, you can take the trace of the Reynold-shear-stress tensor.
epsilon will occure in the equation in this way:


the k-equation is the trace of the Rij-tensor: Meaning in the k-equation, which can be derrived by avg(u'i*Ns(ui))=0
you will get a dissipation-term like the following (factor 2 is not there, because trace):


meaning, epsilon is a tensor built out of the second derivation of the turbulent energy k (correct?).
the units for k~m˛/s˛, epsilon~m˛/sł

If you look then to the specific dissipation rate omega, as also defined as omega=epsilon/(Cµ*k)~1/T (according to the turbulent viscosity definition),
then omega should be mathematically seen a tensor built by the tensors k/epsilon.

But what is then the correct mathematic definition.

If you look further to the k-omega-SST equations. Menter transformed the epsilon in the k-epsilon to suit the omega-equation. So an additional term occurs in the transformed epsilon-equation:


(this is the cross-diffusion modification, see manuals CFX of Fluent, or StarCD).

Where can I derive this term from the epsilon and omega-definition?

Or again, what is the correct mathematical definition of omega?

thnx a lot,

kippo is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbulent dissipation rate pluto STAR-CCM+ 3 November 11, 2009 15:41
surface reaction rate zhou FLUENT 4 October 2, 2003 16:16
TKE SPECTRUM & DISSIPATION Christian Paukert Main CFD Forum 2 March 14, 2001 20:34
how to decide boundary condition of turbulence energy dissipation rate? Vincent B. Main CFD Forum 5 October 28, 1999 04:07
calculation of (turbulent) dissipation energy ? max Main CFD Forum 3 August 18, 1999 09:42

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:30.