|
[Sponsors] |
parallel error with cyclic BCs for pimpleDyMFoam and trouble in resuming running |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 28, 2012, 06:51 |
parallel error with cyclic BCs for pimpleDyMFoam and trouble in resuming running
|
#1 |
Member
Nick
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tongji University,Shanghai,China
Posts: 33
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 14 |
Two problems found when using pimpleDyMFoam and waveDisplacement:
1. When I use pimpleDyMFoam together with cyclic boundary conditions,(actually I use waveDisplacement, you can try the movingCylinder case, with a pair of cyclic boundaries and oscillatingVelocity for the cylinder, the same thing happens) parallel running cracks: after about 2 or 3 timeSteps, running stopped with the message " face o area does not match neighbour by 0.0195% --possible face ordering problem", no matter what kind of decomposition method I use, the same problem always appears. But when I use a single core to run it, no such problem happens. So I assume there might be some bugs in parallel running of dynamic mesh cases with cyclic BCs. Has anyone encountered this before? If anyone is interested, just let me know, I can post the tutorial. 2. When I use waveDisplacement to simulate a imposed wave motion of the bottom surface, something even more strange happens: if I stop the running, and resume it, it just explodes with the error "Floating point exception (core dumped)"! This is serious cause I cannot assure the running keeps going until I get satisfactory results. Once it stops, it cannot be resumed! Again, if anyone is interested, I can post the tutorial. |
|
Tags |
cyclic boundaries, parallel error, pimpledymfoam, trouble with resuming, wavedisplacement |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
License trouble: ANSLIC_ADMIN, FLEXlm not running, but two lmgrd processes running! | dancoz87 | ANSYS | 17 | November 14, 2016 01:10 |
Trouble with parallel runs | cfdmarkus | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | February 27, 2009 03:59 |