CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion

foamMeshToFluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By robdeb

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 28, 2013, 06:00
Default foamMeshToFluent
  #1
New Member
 
Robin Debroux
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 4
robdeb is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody,

I've converted my OpenFOAM mesh into a .msh file but for 2D case OpenFOAM created a 3D mesh with the "empty" condition for the front and back faces. But in Fluent, this condition doesn't exist.

I'm a new user of Fluent, so can somebody tell if there is a simple way to fix this issue?

Thanks
robdeb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2013, 07:41
Default
  #2
Member
 
Arina
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 7
Akuji is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Akuji
Quote:
Originally Posted by robdeb View Post
Hi everybody,

I've converted my OpenFOAM mesh into a .msh file but for 2D case OpenFOAM created a 3D mesh with the "empty" condition for the front and back faces. But in Fluent, this condition doesn't exist.

I'm a new user of Fluent, so can somebody tell if there is a simple way to fix this issue?

Thanks
If I understand you correctly, you don't know why you have a boundary conditions 'empty' for the front and back faces?
If so, you might know, that OpenFOAM couldn't solve 2D task, only 3D. For the 2D cases he creates a volume task, the thickness = 1 cell. And for this volume b.c. is 'empty'.
Akuji is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2013, 08:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Robin Debroux
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 4
robdeb is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akuji View Post
If I understand you correctly, you don't know why you have a boundary conditions 'empty' for the front and back faces?
If so, you might know, that OpenFOAM couldn't solve 2D task, only 3D. For the 2D cases he creates a volume task, the thickness = 1 cell. And for this volume b.c. is 'empty'.
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
I had understood what OpenFOAM was doing. But when I convert my mesh to Fluent, it "sees" it as a 3D body with my front and back faces but I can't put an equivalent condition that does the same as "empty". So I can't solve my 2D problem with Fluent.
robdeb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2013, 08:35
Post
  #4
Senior Member
 
Tushar C.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: IIT, India
Posts: 289
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 8
Tushar@cfd is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by robdeb View Post
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
I had understood what OpenFOAM was doing. But when I convert my mesh to Fluent, it "sees" it as a 3D body with my front and back faces but I can't put an equivalent condition that does the same as "empty". So I can't solve my 2D problem with Fluent.

Well, if am not wrong you are converting from OpenFOAM to Fluent.

Now, the problem is OpenFOAM will only read the 3D mesh geometry, so as a user for 2D simulation one has to make 3D geometry in OpenFOAM. Since, you have made a 3D geometry by using blockmesh code so, when you will import in fluent it will show you the same.

For the case of fluent, the condition is different it needs 2D mesh for 2D simulation and 3D mesh for 3D simulation.

This means, you won't be able to call (or import) a case of 2D mesh/simulation of OpenFOAM for the 2D simulation of fluent.

I hope you got the point.
Tushar@cfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2013, 09:30
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Robin Debroux
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 4
robdeb is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tushar@cfd View Post
Well, if am not wrong you are converting from OpenFOAM to Fluent.

Now, the problem is OpenFOAM will only read the 3D mesh geometry, so as a user for 2D simulation one has to make 3D geometry in OpenFOAM. Since, you have made a 3D geometry by using blockmesh code so, when you will import in fluent it will show you the same.

For the case of fluent, the condition is different it needs 2D mesh for 2D simulation and 3D mesh for 3D simulation.

This means, you won't be able to call (or import) a case of 2D mesh/simulation of OpenFOAM for the 2D simulation of fluent.

I hope you got the point.
Yes, I got it.
So there's no way to fix the problem, that's what I wanted to know.
Thank you very much.
robdeb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2013, 17:43
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
immortality's Avatar
 
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,173
Rep Power: 16
immortality is on a distinguished road
hi
I have the same issue.
Did you resolved the problem?
immortality is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2013, 08:58
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Robin Debroux
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 4
robdeb is on a distinguished road
Hi,
Yes, if you use the "symmetry condition", it will solve a 2D case as with the "empty condition" of OpenFOAM
immortality likes this.
robdeb is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
foamMeshToFluent does not write zones doubtsincfd OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 5 December 1, 2014 08:42
FoamMeshToFluent tutlhino OpenFOAM Post-Processing 2 March 7, 2014 11:20
Using foamMeshToFluent Rickard.Solsjo ANSYS 0 March 9, 2012 03:54
foamMeshToFluent not working with snappyhexmesh calim_cfd OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities 3 January 9, 2012 10:10
FoamMeshToFluent 2D axi frackowi OpenFOAM Post-Processing 1 February 12, 2008 21:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:28.