|
[Sponsors] |
November 20, 2012, 04:20 |
courant number <-> mesh quality
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 13 |
hey folks,
i am currently encountering the problem that even for very small time-steps (0.0001), the courant number of my problem explodes at some point of the simulation (in icoFoam). Since i have to simulate ~50s in total, I really dont wanna go to even smaller time steps. I think the problem is mesh quality, because the simulation stayed stable a bit longer when I used more non-orthogonal corrector steps. plus i could see in the results that the velocity exploded in regions of low mesh quality... so my question is this: what kind of mesh errors have the biggest influence on the courant number, according to your experience? so far, i have mainly focused on improving equiangle skewness, but i'm not sure if that is really the best choice. btw: both "smooth elements globally" and "smooth hexahedral mesh - orthogonal" did not work for me at all (made it all worse) - is there someone else who experienced that? best, kpax |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Add Mesh Layers doesnt work on the whole surface | Kryo | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | February 17, 2022 07:34 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 06:20 |
[snappyHexMesh] How to Do External Mesh for Airfoil sHM | msuaeronautics | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | September 23, 2012 04:00 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 07:36 |