|
[Sponsors] |
How do we know ANSYS's simulations are correct? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 4, 2015, 00:04 |
How do we know ANSYS's simulations are correct?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 10 |
Someone was talking to me about how "insanely powerful" ANSYS is, and in 10 years it is going to be pretty much synonymous with the word "engineering." What would you guys (a lot of whom are seasoned experts in this field) say ab out that?
While in my senior FEA class I too was really impressed with ANSYS' power in getting correct answers (for tests that could be checked easily against by hand), I was wondering how correct the simulations would be for tests that solely rely on the ANSYS : How do we know ANSYS's modeling is correct in areas that cannot (or have not) been tested in real life (say for example deepwater tests in the arctic), or supersonic speeds through short diameter pipes, etc)? Just curious as to whether to take answers with a grain (or jar haha) of salt or not... FWIW, I am thoroughly enjoying the universe of ANSYS and am really impressed with it so far! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is my Dynamic mesh setup correct? | cfd seeker | FLUENT | 16 | October 30, 2020 06:16 |
Gate valve flow simulations... | nikesh | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 5 | January 28, 2014 01:31 |
Periodic boundary conditions in 3D Eulerian granular flow simulations | dsm | FLUENT | 4 | March 2, 2012 19:04 |
Hardware selection for steady/unsteady incompressible, turbulent and cht simulations | maddalena | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 13, 2011 08:55 |
Cumulative continuity error large in parallel simulations | xiao | OpenFOAM | 3 | March 7, 2011 04:13 |