CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS

Best Association Practice for 3D meshing w/ICEM (associate edge, face, vertices..?)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   January 11, 2012, 10:16
Default Best Association Practice for 3D meshing w/ICEM (associate edge, face, vertices..?)
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 14
scribby182 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am a new user of ICEM struggling with getting my associations correct while generating a 3D mesh in ICEM. I am working on a linear turbine cascade. My geometry is specified through curves for the airfoil using an IGES file. The IGES file only contains the airfoil (no domain walls like inflow, outflow, top, bottom, etc) so after importing the IGES file I then use the geometry generation in ICEM to specify these curves. After doing all this, I have the domain I want specified completely by a series of curves.

I have a pretty good idea about my blocking strategy. I am either going to use a 4HO grid or maybe a shifted periodic grid. In either case though my problem hasn’t been getting good mesh quality so much as getting any mesh at all. I’ve tried a few times, but whatever I do I can’t get control of all the associations correctly and I end up having a pre-mesh with grid lines overlapping one another, etc.

In my first attempt I tried converting the geometry into surfaces for each part and then associating those to the block faces. I don’t remember the full details, but it seemed like sometimes I also needed to associate some edges to curves as well when doing this. The problem there was that the surface edges and the curves were a little outside of tolerance and thus the behavior wasn’t as I hoped. I also had some overlapping cells.

For my second attempt I tried solely using curves and edges, but that went even worse. Even when I tried to explicitly set all the associations to the blade and outer walls I still had many overlapping cells/blocks in the pre-mesh. I think a lot of my internal block edges/vertices (ie block edges/vertices that should be in the fluid, not attached to a physical body/boundary) kept getting associated to geometry. I tried removing their associations and only specifying the associations for the outer boundary and blade, but I still had the problem.

I’m sure I’m doing several things wrong, but my biggest question is whether I should be trying to associate completely using surfaces, completely using edges, or some combination of the two (or if it really matters). Should associating a face to a surface be enough, or do you also need to associate the edges and vertices?

Really appreciate any advice people can give. Thanks very much. Sorry for not including screenshots/geometries, but its something I really can’t share openly.

Andrew
scribby182 is offline   Reply With Quote

 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[blockMesh] Internal walls of zero thickness anger OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 23 February 6, 2020 18:25
Meshing a Sphere Ajay FLUENT 10 September 3, 2016 14:18
GAMBIT - Creating and meshing face by sweeping Woo Meng Wai FLUENT 3 July 23, 2008 08:17
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 11:55
Gambit face meshing with a common edge stella FLUENT 1 October 28, 2005 05:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:02.