|
[Sponsors] |
September 30, 2005, 11:23 |
Combustion nomenclature
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just a nomeclature question
Shall I add the nomenclature required for reacting flows in the nomenclature section of the textbook and keep a common view across the Wiki or because combustion is somehow apart keep it separate, keep in mind that combustion will probably add A LOT of nomeclature. |
|
September 30, 2005, 20:20 |
Re: Combustion nomenclature
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
My initial response is that we should put everything in one nomenclature. However, if the combustion related nomenclature would create a lot of double meanings for variables then it might be better to create a separate nomenclature section for that to avoid confusing people with double meanings for some variables in the nomenclauture.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
combustion model in premixed combustion chamber | wuyu | FLUENT | 9 | February 16, 2018 10:40 |
Hydrogen Air combustion in a combustion chamber | popi | CFX | 7 | July 11, 2007 18:40 |
Sawdust Combustion-Non-premixed Combustion Model | Jessy | FLUENT | 1 | June 19, 2007 10:59 |
combustion in internal combustion engine | George | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 7, 2006 14:41 |
Nomenclature | Anurag Sharma | CFD-Wiki | 3 | September 22, 2005 08:15 |